Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 2 School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
  • 3 Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 4 School of Pharmacy, Taylor's University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. Electronic address: teoh.siew.li@monash.edu
Value Health, 2023 Oct;26(10):1558-1576.
PMID: 37236395 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.011

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Decision-analytic models (DAMs) with varying structures and assumptions have been applied in economic evaluations (EEs) to assist decision making for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) therapeutics. This systematic review aimed to summarize and critically appraise the EEs of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for HFrEF.

METHODS: A systematic search of English articles and gray literature, published from January 2010, was performed on databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, NHSEED, health technology assessment, Cochrane Library, etc. The included studies were EEs with DAMs that compared the costs and outcomes of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid-receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. The study quality was evaluated using the Bias in Economic Evaluation (ECOBIAS) 2015 checklist and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklists.

RESULTS: A total of 59 EEs were included. Markov model, with a lifetime horizon and a monthly cycle length, was most commonly used in evaluating GDMTs for HFrEF. Most EEs conducted in the high-income countries demonstrated that novel GDMTs for HFrEF were cost-effective compared with the standard of care, with the standardized median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $21 361/quality-adjusted life-year. The key factors influencing ICERs and study conclusions included model structures, input parameters, clinical heterogeneity, and country-specific willingness-to-pay threshold.

CONCLUSIONS: Novel GDMTs were cost-effective compared with the standard of care. Given the heterogeneity of the DAMs and ICERs, alongside variations in willingness-to-pay thresholds across countries, there is a need to conduct country-specific EEs, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, using model structures that are coherent with the local decision context.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.