Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • 2 Laboratory on Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, Tomsk State University, 634050, Tomsk, Russia
  • 3 Center for Research in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science & Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 5 Centre of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 UMP Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Physics and Applied Mathematics and Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nilore 45650, Islamabad, Pakistan
Heliyon, 2023 Aug;9(8):e18676.
PMID: 37554841 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18676

Abstract

The use of nanomaterials as a means of recovering heavy and light oil from petroleum reservoirs has increased over the preceding twenty years. Most researchers have found that injecting a nanoparticle dispersion (nanofluids) has led to good results and increased the amount of oil that can be recovered. In this research, we aim to imitate the three-dimensional hexagonal prism in the existence of SiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles for better oil recovery. Porosity (0.1≤φ≤0.4), mass flow rate (0.05mL/min≤Q≤0.05ml/min), nanoparticle concentration (0.01≤ψ≤0.04), and the effect of relative permeability (kr) on oil and water saturation in the presence of gravity under different time durations are all investigated. The result obtained for the model is verified with existing experimental data. The results indicated that the infulence of nanoparticle volume fraction (VF) is significant in enhancing the oil recovery rate. It is also observed that at low porosity values the oil recovery is maximum. The maximum oil recovery is attained at low values of mass flow rate in the 3D hexagonal prism in the presence of silicon and aluminium nanoparticles It is also observed that the use of SiO2 gives a better oil recovery rate than Al2O3. It is also observed that maximum oil recovery is obtained at 99% at a flow rate of 0.05 mL/min in the presence of silicon injection.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.