Affiliations 

  • 1 Division of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, No.34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, the National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 4 Division of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, No.34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China. yflin@hku.hk
Head Face Med, 2023 Aug 23;19(1):38.
PMID: 37612673 DOI: 10.1186/s13005-023-00383-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery has gained significant attention in recent years. However, there is a lack of bibliometric reports that analyze the academic literature in this field to identify publishing and citation trends. By conducting an analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on AI in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, we aim to unveil popular research topics, key authors, institutions, countries, and journals in this area.

METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Science (WOS) electronic database to identify the top 100 most-cited articles on AI in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Publication and citation data were obtained and further analyzed and visualized using R Biblioshiny. The key domains of the 100 articles were also identified.

RESULTS: The top 100 most-cited articles were published between 2005 and 2022, contributed by 458 authors, with an average citation count of 22.09. South Korea emerged as the leading contributor with the highest number of publications (28) and citations (595), followed by China (16, 373), and the United States (7, 248). Notably, six South Korean authors ranked among the top 10 contributors, and three South Korean institutions were listed as the most productive. International collaborations were predominantly observed between the United States, China, and South Korea. The main domains of the articles focused on automated imaging assessment (42%), aiding diagnosis and treatment planning (34%), and the assessment of growth and development (10%). Besides, a positive correlation was observed between the testing sample size and citation counts (P = 0.010), as well as between the time of publication and citation counts (P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.