METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database. Articles published between 2015 and 2025 were retrieved and analysed using Bibliometrix (R) and VOSviewer. Publication trends, trend topics, keyword co-occurrence, citation patterns, and thematic and conceptual structure maps were examined to identify dominant research areas and emerging themes.
RESULTS: A total of 749 publications were included, showing an annual growth rate of 12.47%, indicating an emerging yet expanding field. Trend topic analysis revealed that early studies (2015-2018) focused on teaching methods and assessment, whereas post-2020 research shifted toward digital and simulation-based learning, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The top three high-impact keywords based on average citation are "deep learning", "computer simulation" and "augmented reality". Conceptual structure mapping revealed four main domains: Technological innovation, pedagogy, clinical skill learning, and adaptive education, reflecting a shift toward digitally integrated and technology-supported teaching approaches in dental education. The thematic map identified e-learning and online learning as key motor themes driving digital transformation, with foundational themes such as simulation, VR, and digital dentistry supporting this shift.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights a decade of pedagogical and technological evolution in dental education. Bibliometric mapping reveals growing scholarly engagement with digital and simulation-based learning, supporting a transition toward student-centred, competency-based, and technology-integrated curricula.
METHODS: We employed a methodical bibliometric approach, making use of Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases for gathering literatures. We planned our search strategy, concentrating on terms linked to "breast imaging," "image quality," and "diagnostic accuracy" to ensure a systematic examination of the subject. The enhanced search functions in these databases enabled us to narrow down and improve our findings, choosing only the articles, conference papers, and book sections that are most relevant. After conducting a thorough screening process to remove duplicates and evaluate significance, we utilized ScientoPy and VOSviewer software for an in-depth bibliometric analysis. This helped to explore trends in publications, patterns of citations, and thematic groups, giving us a better understanding of how the field has changed and where it currently stands. Our approach prioritized assessing methodological quality and bias in the studies we included, guaranteeing the reliability of our findings.
RESULTS: We reviewed 2984 relevant publications, revealing a consistent annual growth rate of 2.8% in breast imaging research, with the United States and Europe leading in contributions. The study found that advancements in radiological technologies and international collaboration are driving forces behind the field's expansion. Key subject areas such as 'Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging' dominated, underscoring their impact on diagnostic quality. Notable authors and institutions have been identified for their influential research, characterized by high citation metrics and significant scholarly impact.
CONCLUSION: The study shows a continuous increase in research on breast imaging, considered by new technologies and teamwork defining the present time. The assessment highlights a key move towards utilizing digital imaging methods and computational analysis, affecting the improvement of future diagnostic procedures and patients' results. The study highlights the importance of continued international collaborations to tackle the new barriers in breast imaging and make the most of technological progress.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study shows a focus on using interdisciplinary methods and cutting-edge technology in breast imaging to help healthcare professionals improve their performance and accuracy in diagnosis. Recognizing vital research and emerging trends should guide clinical guidelines, radiology training, and patient care plans to encourage the use of effective techniques and stimulate innovation in diagnostic approaches.
METHODS: A descriptive analysis of bibliographic data and network visualization were conducted using Microsoft Excel and VosViewer, focusing on literature published in the Scopus database between 1994 and 2023 and using "title" as the search field.
RESULTS: For the study period, the following were identified: 1429 authors, 5858 total citations, and an h-index of 36. From a total of 2058 publications discovered, 363 publications were included in the study. Of these, only 11 articles addressed nonpharmacological management for people with LDs. In terms of the research country, the United Kingdom was the leading contributor, with 56 publications. Ad de Jongh was the most productive author, with 13 publications and 447 citations. The most highly cited paper was Lehrner et al. (2005), with 312 citations.
CONCLUSION: This study determined the number of publications related to nonpharmacological management of DA over three decades. The number of studies involving people with LDs was lower than that involving the general population, suggesting future research should occur in this area.