Affiliations 

  • 1 Construction and Projects Department, University of Fallujah, Fallujah 31002, Iraq
  • 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Maarif University College (AUC), Ramadi 31001, Iraq
  • 3 Membrane Technology Research Unit, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Alsena'a Street 52, Baghdad 10066, Iraq
  • 4 Department of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
  • 5 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 6 NYUAD Water Research Center, Abu Dhabi Campus, New York University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 129188, United Arab Emirates
  • 7 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mutah University, P.O. Box 7, Karak 61710, Jordan
Membranes (Basel), 2023 Dec 05;13(12).
PMID: 38132904 DOI: 10.3390/membranes13120900

Abstract

Vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) has attracted increasing interest for various applications besides seawater desalination. Experimental testing of membrane technologies such as VMD on a pilot or large scale can be laborious and costly. Machine learning techniques can be a valuable tool for predicting membrane performance on such scales. In this work, a novel hybrid model was developed based on incorporating a spotted hyena optimizer (SHO) with support vector machine (SVR) to predict the flux pressure in VMD. The SVR-SHO hybrid model was validated with experimental data and benchmarked against other machine learning tools such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), classical SVR, and multiple linear regression (MLR). The results show that the SVR-SHO predicted flux pressure with high accuracy with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.94. However, other models showed a lower prediction accuracy than SVR-SHO with R-values ranging from 0.801 to 0.902. Global sensitivity analysis was applied to interpret the obtained result, revealing that feed temperature was the most influential operating parameter on flux, with a relative importance score of 52.71 compared to 17.69, 17.16, and 14.44 for feed flowrate, vacuum pressure intensity, and feed concentration, respectively.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.