Affiliations 

  • 1 Ivanovsky Institute of Virology of the National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology of N.F. Gamaleya of the Russian Ministry of Health, 16 Gamaleya Street, 123098 Moscow, Russian Federation; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, 1a Malaya Pirogovskaya Street, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation. Electronic address: omorozova2010@gmail.com
  • 2 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Street, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • 3 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Street, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation. Electronic address: bvntbe@yandex.ru
Infect Genet Evol, 2020 Jun;80:104187.
PMID: 31927073 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104187

Abstract

Two dominant species of wild small rodents trapped in Novosibirsk region, South-Western Siberia, Russia differed in their susceptibility to the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) infection. TBEV RNA average detection rate for Northern red-backed vole Myodes rutilus (Pallas, 1779) (82.2 ± 5.8% blood samples and 63.1 ± 2.7% organ samples) significantly exceeded the corresponding values for the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius (Pallas, 1771) (47.0 ± 8.7% blood and 24.5 ± 2.8% organ samples) (p <0.001). Innate immunity may be one of possible reasons of the differences. Th1 cytokine gene expression distinguished between M. rutilus (12.5 ± 8.5%) and A. agrarius (66.6 ± 11.4%), whereas Th2 cytokine frequencies were statistically similar (81.8 ± 12.2% and 100.0%, respectively). Polarization indexes (PI) of the innate immunity calculated as ratio of Th2 to Th1 cytokine RNA detection rates for both M. rutilus (6.5) and A. agrarius (1.5) suggested Th2 mainly humoral immune response against persistent TBEV in natural mammalian hosts. Therefore, the TBEV-induced antibodies were analyzed by ELISA and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests. The TBEV-specific antibodies were detected in 74.8 ± 4.3% sera of M. rutilus and 67.3 ± 6.8% of A. agrarius. Among them HI antibodies were found in 4.8 ± 2.1% of the same analyzed sera of M. rutilus and in 6.0 ± 3.4% blood samples of A. agrarius only. To model the TBEV persistence both M. rutilus and A. agrarius were infected with the suspensions of the TBEV-infected ticks with further observations during 4 subsequent months. Detection rate of the TBEV RNA and antigen E remained high during the whole period, however, pathogenic for laboratory suckling mice virus was isolated up to 8 days postinfection. At late stages of the persistent infection (1-4 months) the TBEV RNA detection rate in northern red-backed voles remained high 70.6 ± 7.9% whereas in striped field mice significantly declined to 26.7 ± 9.2% (p  .05) but Th1 cytokine mRNA detection rates were different (44.4 ± 12.5% and 85.7 ± 9.7%, respectively) (p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.