Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia
  • 2 Computational Intelligence & Intelligent Optimization Research Group, Business & Economics School, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
  • 3 Department of Operation Management, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 4 Department of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 5 Computer Science and Engineering, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
Front Oncol, 2023;13:1276232.
PMID: 38425674 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276232

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This large case-control study explored the application of machine learning models to identify risk factors for primary invasive incident breast cancer (BC) in the Iranian population. This study serves as a bridge toward improved BC prevention, early detection, and management through the identification of modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors.

METHODS: The dataset includes 1,009 cases and 1,009 controls, with comprehensive data on lifestyle, health-behavior, reproductive and sociodemographic factors. Different machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), Neural Networks (NN), Bootstrap Aggregating Classification and Regression Trees (Bagged CART), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost), were employed to analyze the data.

RESULTS: The findings highlight the significance of a chest X-ray history, deliberate weight loss, abortion history, and post-menopausal status as predictors. Factors such as second-hand smoking, lower education, menarche age (>14), occupation (employed), first delivery age (18-23), and breastfeeding duration (>42 months) were also identified as important predictors in multiple models. The RF model exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.9, as indicated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Following closely was the Bagged CART model with an AUC of 0.89, while the XGBoost model achieved a slightly lower AUC of 0.78. In contrast, the NN model demonstrated the lowest AUC of 0.74. On the other hand, the RF model achieved an accuracy of 83.9% and a Kappa coefficient of 67.8% and the XGBoost, achieved a lower accuracy of 82.5% and a lower Kappa coefficient of 0.6.

CONCLUSION: This study could be beneficial for targeted preventive measures according to the main risk factors for BC among high-risk women.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.