Affiliations 

  • 1 Geographic Information Science Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 2 Geohazard Department Manager, Samaneh Kansar Zamin (SKZ) Company, Tehran, Iran
  • 3 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. h.shahabi@uok.ac.ir
  • 4 Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering & Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2117, USA
  • 5 Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
  • 6 Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Science and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
  • 7 College of Geology & Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
  • 8 Young Researchers and Elites Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • 9 State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
  • 10 Department of Geoinformation, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Sci Rep, 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15364.
PMID: 30337603 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33755-7

Abstract

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) includes two novel GIS-based ensemble artificial intelligence approaches called imperialistic competitive algorithm (ICA) and firefly algorithm (FA). This combination could result in ANFIS-ICA and ANFIS-FA models, which were applied to flood spatial modelling and its mapping in the Haraz watershed in Northern Province of Mazandaran, Iran. Ten influential factors including slope angle, elevation, stream power index (SPI), curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), lithology, rainfall, land use, stream density, and the distance to river were selected for flood modelling. The validity of the models was assessed using statistical error-indices (RMSE and MSE), statistical tests (Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), and the area under the curve (AUC) of success. The prediction accuracy of the models was compared to some new state-of-the-art sophisticated machine learning techniques that had previously been successfully tested in the study area. The results confirmed the goodness of fit and appropriate prediction accuracy of the two ensemble models. However, the ANFIS-ICA model (AUC = 0.947) had a better performance in comparison to the Bagging-LMT (AUC = 0.940), BLR (AUC = 0.936), LMT (AUC = 0.934), ANFIS-FA (AUC = 0.917), LR (AUC = 0.885) and RF (AUC = 0.806) models. Therefore, the ANFIS-ICA model can be introduced as a promising method for the sustainable management of flood-prone areas.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.