Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, QIS College of Engineering and Technology, Ongole 523272, India
  • 2 Solar Energy Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Vasavi Engineering College (A), Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh 534101, India; Centre for Research in Advanced Fluid and Process, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, Gambang, Kuantan 26300, Pahang, Malaysia; Faculty of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • 3 New Uzbekistan University, Movarounnahr street 1, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan; Institute of Theoretical Physics, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan; University of Tashkent for Applied Sciences, Str. Gavhar 1, Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan
  • 4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Dhanbad 826 004, Jharkhand, India
  • 5 Faculty of Physics and Technical Sciences, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan E-mail: enu@enu.kz
  • 6 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Khartoum, 45Al-Nit Avenue, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum, Sudan; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan
Water Sci Technol, 2024 Jun;89(12):3325-3343.
PMID: 39150427 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2024.189

Abstract

In this current investigation, the experimental performance of a solar still basin was significantly enhanced by incorporating snail shell biomaterials. The outcomes of the snail shell-augmented solar still basin (SSSS) are compared with those of a conventional solar still (CSS). The utilization of snail shells proved to facilitate the reduction of saline water and enhance its temperature, thereby improving the productivity of the SSSS. Cumulatively, the SSSS productivity was improved by 4.3% over CSS. Furthermore, the SSSS outperformed in energy and exergy efficiency of CSS by 4.5 and 3.5%, respectively. Economically, the cost per liter of distillate (CPL) for the CSS was 3.4% higher than SSSS. Moreover, the SSSS showed a shorter estimated payback period (PBP) of 141 days which was 6 days less than CSS. Considering the environmental impact, the observed CO2 emissions from the SSSS were approximately 14.6% higher than CSS over its 10-year lifespan. Notably, the SSSS exhibited a substantial increase in the estimated carbon credit earned (CCE) compared to the CSS. Ultimately, the research underscores the efficacy of incorporating snail shells into solar still basins as a commendable approach to organic waste management, offering economic benefits without compromising environmental considerations.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.