Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia
  • 2 Department of Radiology, Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia
  • 3 Radiology Installation, Gambiran General Hospital, Kediri, East Java, 64133, Indonesia
  • 4 Instrumentation and Control Research Group, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha, 10, Labtek, 40132 Bandung, Indonesia
  • 5 Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
  • 7 Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia. Electronic address: endarko@its.ac.id
Radiography (Lond), 2024 Dec 11;31(1):254-263.
PMID: 39667263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.023

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Phantom materials with tissue-equivalent physical properties that require regular evaluation using patented phantoms are essential for medical device quality assurance programs. This study evaluated phantom materials for tissue equivalence and their use in image quality assessment for breast ultrasound scanner performance testing using two custom-made phantoms.

METHODS: Two types of phantoms were developed: phantoms A and B. Phantom A was made from a base material consisting of polyvinyl chloride-plastisol with the addition of glycerol, whereas phantom B consisted of polyvinyl chloride-plastisol with the addition of graphite. Each phantom had a stiff and soft lesion shaped like a sphere, with a diameter of 1.4 cm. The phantoms were cuboids with dimensions of 10 × 10 cm2 and a thickness of 5 cm. A series of phantom evaluations was performed, consisting of density, elasticity, acoustic properties, B-mode ultrasound images, and strain ratio.

RESULTS: The characterisation results show that background A closely resembles fibroglandular tissue in terms of density and acoustic properties (<5% variation); background B only resembles fibroglandular tissue in terms of density (-1.8% variation). In terms of elasticity, both backgrounds were close to the minimum value of fibroglandular tissue elasticity. The soft lesion on the phantom had a slightly lower density and elasticity than the carcinoma, whereas its acoustic properties (speed of sound and attenuation coefficient) were slightly higher than those of the reference carcinoma. Both phantoms were consistent with the literature in terms of strain ratio, geometric accuracy, lesion detection, and mean pixel value and showed good potential stability over one year.

CONCLUSION: This study successfully described the fabrication and evaluation sequence of a phantom equivalent to breast fibroglandular tissue and its evaluation via ultrasound imaging.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study offers proprietary information essential for the fabrication of phantoms that can be used for quality assurance and control in ultrasound imaging.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.