Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
  • 2 Department of Pediatrics, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
  • 3 Division of Preventative Healthcare, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan
  • 4 Technical Head, Cgenic Meditech Pvt Ltd, Gujarat 390020, India
  • 5 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, 130200 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia
  • 6 Division of Medical Operations, Metro Sihat Sdn Bhd, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of the Director, Pillar of Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15237, USA
  • 8 Department of Psychiatry, Jooyoun's Psychiatry, 07938 Seoul, Korea
  • 9 Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6909, Australia
  • 10 GM Office, EPS BIO Technology Corp., Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan
  • 11 Management (Including R&D Director), CareforU Co., Ltd., 14042 Anyang, Korea
  • 12 Children's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6909, Australia
  • 13 Department of Pediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
  • 14 University Children's Hospital Basel UKBB, Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
  • 15 Management (Marketing & Development), CareforU Co., Ltd., 14042 Anyang, Korea
J Endocr Soc, 2024 Nov 26;9(1):bvae210.
PMID: 39703363 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae210

Abstract

Globally, nearly 9 million people are living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although the incidence of T1D is not affected by socioeconomic status, the development of complications and limited access to modern therapy is overrepresented in vulnerable populations. Diabetes technology, specifically continuous glucose monitoring and automated insulin delivery systems, are considered the gold standard for management of T1D, yet access to these technologies varies widely across countries and regions, and varies widely even within high-income countries. This review focuses on disparities in diabetes technology use among adolescents and young adults with T1D, barriers to access and use, and summarizes common themes emerging across countries and regions. We conducted a survey among medical technology manufacturers and physicians in various countries across diverse geographical regions and performed extensive literature searches. Across all countries and regions, economic barriers stand out as the largest and most common barriers, either preventing market penetrance of technology into a country or limiting its access to the individual with diabetes due to high out of pocket costs. Other common barriers include structural or accessibility barriers, such as stringent eligibility requirements by insurance providers, regardless of whether the insurance was private or government-based, and provider/individual level barriers. Based on the evidence presented, we suggest the need for a joint effort involving governments, private health insurers, technology manufacturers, and healthcare providers to address the global disparities of diabetic technology utilization and ensure equitable access for all individuals living with T1D worldwide.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.