Affiliations 

  • 1 Fuel Cell Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia. msingla0509@gmail.com
  • 2 Fuel Cell Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Interdisciplinary Courses in Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chitkara University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
  • 4 University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, 140413, Mohali, India
  • 5 Department of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Naval Science University of Nowshahr, Nowshahr, Iran. m_khishe@alumni.iust.ac.ir
  • 6 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, 603203, Tamil Nadu, India. g.gulothungan@gmail.com
  • 7 Industrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11421, Saudi Arabia
Sci Rep, 2025 Feb 11;15(1):5122.
PMID: 39934364 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89631-8

Abstract

Parameter identification in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) entails the application of optimization algorithms to ascertain the optimal unknown variables essential for crafting an accurate model that predicts fuel-cell performance. These parameters are typically not included in the manufacturer's datasheet and must be identified to ensure precise modeling and forecasting of fuel cell behavior. This paper introduces a recently developed hybrid algorithm (Aquila Optimizer Arithmetic Algorithm Optimization (AOAAO)) that enhances the AO and AAO algorithm's efficiency through a novel mutation strategy, aimed at determining seven unknown parameters of a PEMFC during the optimization process. These parameters function as decision variables, and the objective function aimed for minimization is the sum square error (SSE) between the predicted and actual measured cell voltages. AOAAO demonstrated superior performance across various metrics, achieving an SSE minimum in comparison to other compared algorithm. AOAAO's robustness was validated through extensive testing with six commercially available PEMFCs, including BCS 500 W-PEM, 500 W SR-12PEM, Nedstack PS6 PEM, H-12 PEM, HORIZON 500 W PEM, and a 250 W-stack, across twelve case studies derived from various operational conditions detailed in manufacturers' datasheets. For each datasheet, both Current-Voltage (I/V) and Power-Voltage (P/V) characteristics of the PEMFCs scenarios closely aligned with those observed in experimental data, affirming AOAAO's superior accuracy, robustness, and time efficiency for real-time fuel cell modeling. In terms of computational efficiency, AOAAO runtime is significantly faster than all compared algorithms, demonstrating an efficiency improvement of approximately 98%.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.