Affiliations 

  • 1 Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 2 IDOM Consulting, Engineering, Architecture, S.A.U, Bilbao, Spain
  • 3 Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil
  • 4 Waste and Analysis Center, Department of Technology and Society, Stony Brook University, New York, USA
  • 5 Project Technical Department, MVW Lechtenberg & Partner, Duisburg, Germany
  • 6 School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Khurda, Odisha, India
  • 7 Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • 8 Department of Sustainable Engineering, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, India
  • 9 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kampus Alam Pauh Putra, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • 10 Waste Management Professional, Sarek Waste & Resource Management PVT Ltd, Ahmedabad, India
  • 11 Oman Environmental Services Holding Company (be'ah), MSW Operations, Muscat, Oman
  • 12 Department of Waste and Resource Management, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
Waste Manag Res, 2025 Apr 02.
PMID: 40173265 DOI: 10.1177/0734242X251328911

Abstract

Waste minimisation and prevention are crucial for the circular economy (CE), sustainable development goals (SDGs) and environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles, focusing on waste elimination and resource efficiency. However, there are significant gaps in implementing effective waste minimisation strategies, mainly due to the lack of standardised waste prevention terminologies and indicators. This article introduces a novel simplified and comprehensive framework for assessing waste prevention and minimisation measures tailored to developing countries. The primary contribution of this study lies in proposing relevant indicators aligned with the SDGs, ESG standards, and CE principles, while addressing data scarcity through proxy indicators to enable effective assessment in resource-limited settings. Six key indicators were proposed: Zero Waste Index, Food Loss Index, Extended producer responsibility, Education and awareness programmes for waste minimisation, Waste prevention and Plastic Bag Reduction Ratio. Eleven countries were selected as case studies to demonstrate the framework's applicability. The findings reveal that while these countries are progressing in enacting legislation and recognising the importance of waste prevention, compliance in practice is lacking, as indicated by poor quantitative results in actual waste reduction and diversion. The framework evaluates the environmental, social and economic implications of waste prevention measures, showing wide variations among countries. Each country faces unique challenges, but strengthening policy frameworks, investing in infrastructure, promoting public awareness and fostering collaboration are key steps towards advancing sustainable waste management practices. The study highlights the necessity for tailored policies addressing specific weaknesses while ensuring economic viability. The integrated framework provides actionable insights and forward-thinking solutions that can be adapted, scaled and replicated to address developing nations' unique challenges.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.