Affiliations 

  • 1 Fertility North, Joondalup, WA, Australia; School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. Electronic address: tammy.lee@research.uwa.edu.au
  • 2 Embryologist Musings Illustration Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Texas Health Science Centre, San Antonio, TX, USA
  • 4 Monash IVF Group, Cremorne, VIC, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • 5 Oasis Fertility, Hyderabad, India
  • 6 My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 7 Reproductive Medicine Institute, Seoul Miz Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • 8 ART Rainbow IVF, Agra, India
  • 9 Kato Ladies Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
  • 10 Virtus Fertility Centre, Singapore
  • 11 Fertility North, Joondalup, WA, Australia; Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Reprod Biomed Online, 2026 Nov;53(5):105844.
PMID: 42691706 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105844

Abstract

Atypical fertilisation patterns such as 2.1 pronuclei (2.1PN), defined by two normally sized pronuclei and an additional smaller pronucleus, present a clinical challenge due to inconsistent classification and uncertainty regarding their development and genetic potential. This scoping review aims to synthesise the existing evidence, identify gaps in the literature and propose a committee opinion on 2.1PN zygotes, including a working provisional definition, to guide clinical practice and future studies. A PubMed search for studies reporting 2.1PN zygotes and their developmental and clinical outcomes was conducted in May 2025. This review shows conflicting evidence regarding blastulation rates between 2.1PN and 2PN zygotes, and findings on preimplantation genetic testing and live birth rates remain inconclusive due to limited study numbers and sample sizes. Regardless, 2.1PN zygotes should be distinguished from classic 3PN zygotes, cultured to the blastocyst stage and genetically assessed if available. Based on current evidence and expert consensus, we propose a provisional working definition of the 2.1PN zygote to support standardised classification. Current evidence suggests that 2.1PN zygotes can be viable and warrant differentiation from 3PN zygotes. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying 2.1PN formation, determine neonatal and longer-term health outcomes following 2.1PN-derived embryo transfer and validate findings in larger cohorts.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications