Affiliations 

  • 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • 3 Construction Research Center, Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • 4 Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran; Tabadol Dama Gostar Company, Tehran, Iran
  • 5 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia; Advanced Building and Environment Research (ABER) Center, Iran
Data Brief, 2016 Dec;9:448-452.
PMID: 27709121

Abstract

The data presented in this article were the basis for the study reported in the research articles entitled "Evaluation of a two-sided windcatcher integrated with wing wall (as a new design) and comparison with a conventional windcatcher" (P. Nejat, J.K. Calautit, M.Z.A. Majid, B.R. Hughes, I. Zeynali, F. Jomehzadeh, 2016) [1] which presents the effect of wing wall on the air flow distribution under using the windcatchers as a natural ventilation equipment. Here, we detail the wind tunnel testing and numerical set-up used for obtaining the data on ventilation rates and indoor airflow distribution inside a test room with a two-sided windcatcher and wing wall. Three models were integrated with wing wall angled at 30°, 45° and 60° and another windcatcher was a conventional two-sided device. The computer-aided design (CAD) three-dimensional geometries which were produced using Solid Edge modeler are also included in the data article.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.