Affiliations 

  • 1 a Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, London School of Economics , London , UK
  • 2 c World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland
  • 3 d Department of Health, Aging, and Society , McMaster University , Hamilton , ON , Canada
  • 4 e Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway
  • 5 f Giving What We Can, Centre for Effective Altruism , Oxford , UK
  • 6 g Ministry of Health , Bujumbura , Burundi
  • 7 h Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland
  • 8 i Cooperation Division at the Ministry of Health , Rabat , Morocco
  • 9 j Department of Global Health and Population, TH Chan School of Public Health , Harvard University , Boston , MA , USA
  • 10 k Results for Development Institute , Washington , DC , USA
  • 11 l National Health Financing, Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Health , Putrajaya , Malaysia
  • 12 m Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization in Cuba , Havana , Cuba
  • 13 n Kennedy School of Government , Harvard University , Boston , MA , USA
  • 14 o Norwegian Institute of Public Health , Oslo , Norway
  • 15 p Bureau of International Health, Ministry of Public Health , Nonthaburi , Thailand
  • 16 q Pan American Health Organization , Washington , DC , USA
  • 17 r World Bank , Washington , DC , USA
  • 18 s Ministry of Public Health , Nonthaburi , Thailand
  • 19 t Ministry of Health , Accra , Ghana
Health Syst Reform, 2017 Oct 02;3(4):301-312.
PMID: 30359178 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1324938

Abstract

Abstract-Progress toward universal health coverage (UHC) requires making difficult trade-offs. In this journal, Dr. Margaret Chan, the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General, has endorsed the principles for making such decisions put forward by the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and UHC. These principles include maximizing population health, priority for the worse off, and shielding people from health-related financial risks. But how should one apply these principles in particular cases, and how should one adjudicate between them when their demands conflict? This article by some members of the Consultative Group and a diverse group of health policy professionals addresses these questions. It considers three stylized versions of actual policy dilemmas. Each of these cases pertains to one of the three key dimensions of progress toward UHC: which services to cover first, which populations to prioritize for coverage, and how to move from out-of-pocket expenditures to prepayment with pooling of funds. Our cases are simplified to highlight common trade-offs. Though we make specific recommendations, our primary aim is to demonstrate both the form and substance of the reasoning involved in striking a fair balance between competing interests on the road to UHC.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.