Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Geography and Institute for Collaboration on Health Intervention and Prevention, University of Connecticut, 215 Glenbrook Road, AUST 421, U-4148, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. debarchana.ghosh@uconn.edu
  • 2 Department of Communication, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA
  • 3 Section of Infectious Diseases in AIDS Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
  • 4 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
AIDS Behav, 2017 Apr;21(4):1183-1207.
PMID: 27125244 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1413-y

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) and social network-based interventions (SNI) are important analytical tools harnessing peer and family influences critical for HIV prevention and treatment among substance users. While SNA is an effective way to measure social network influences, SNI directly or indirectly involves network members in interventions. Even though these methods have been applied in heterogeneous ways, leading to extensive evidence-based practices, systematic reviews are however, lacking. We searched five bibliographic databases and identified 58 studies involving HIV in substance users that had utilized SNA or SNI as part of their methodology. SNA was used to measure network variables as inputs in statistical/mathematical models in 64 % of studies and only 22 % of studies used SNI. Most studies focused on HIV prevention and few addressed diagnosis (k = 4), care linkage and retention (k = 5), ART adherence (k = 2), and viral suppression (k = 1). This systematic review highlights both the advantages and disadvantages of social network approaches for HIV prevention and treatment and gaps in its use for HIV care continuum.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.