Affiliations 

  • 1 Conservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Malaysian Allied Health Sciences Academy (MAHSA) University, 42610, Bandar Saujana Putra, Selangor, Malaysia. kiransingbal@mahsa.edu.my
  • 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Malaysian Allied Health Sciences Academy (MAHSA) University, 42610, Bandar Saujana Putra, Selangor, Malaysia
Odontology, 2022 Jan;110(1):106-112.
PMID: 34269933 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00643-y

Abstract

To compare the vertical root fracture (VRF) resistance of root canal-treated teeth instrumented with four different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary file systems and examine the dentinal crack pattern and direction using a new classification. Eighty mature mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated, leaving 13 mm of the root. The root samples were mounted in acrylic resin and divided randomly into five groups of different NiTi file systems: Group 1-control, Group 2-T-Pro, Group 3-HyFlex CM, Group 4-TG6 and lastly Group 5-ZenFlex. Samples in Group 2 and Group 3 were instrumented up to size 25/0.04, whereas Group 4 and Group 5 were instrumented up to size 25/0.06. Obturation was performed with AH Plus sealer and gutta-percha using single cone technique. Subsequently, all samples were subjected to occlusal compressive force until they were fractured. The force (N) needed to cause root fracture was recorded. The crack patterns and directions were also inspected under magnification and classified using a new and simple classification. The highest (VRF) resistance was noted in the control group (453.15 ± 92.23 N), followed by T-Pro (387.43 ± 76.81 N), HyFlex CM (381.88 ± 52.73 N), ZenFlex (369.15 ± 89.41 N) and finally TG6 (346.05 ± 72.08 N), but there was no significant difference between T-Pro and HyFlex (P = 0.438). A significantly higher prevalence (P = 0.001) of Type 1 crack pattern was observed, especially in samples instrumented with TG6. Majority of the cracks ran buccolingually except in some samples instrumented with ZenFlex (P = 0.898). Smaller file taper increased the VRF resistance of root canal-treated teeth. Majority of the dentinal crack exhibited Type 1 pattern and ran buccolingually.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.