The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of mild cognitive impairment on pattern electroretinogram (pERG)
among urban elderly Malays. A total of 36 subjects aged 60 years and above comprising of 18 MCI subjects and 18
normal controls were recruited for this study. The inclusion criteria for both the MCI and normal subjects included best
corrected distance visual acuity ≥ 6/9 (Snellen) with refractive error less than ±4.00 DS and/or ±2.00 DC (astigmatism),
near visual acuity ≥ N8, absence or no previous history of any significant media opacities, retinal disorders and ocular
pathologies. pERG was recorded with the RetiPort/Scan21 system in accordance with the International Society for the
Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards. The target presented to subjects through a 19” CRT monitor was a black
and white reversing checkerboard with luminance equal to 80 cd/m2
, contrast 97% and stimulus frequency 2.00 Hz (4
rev/s). Amplitudes and implicit times of P50 and N95 waves generated by the system were noted and compared between
the two groups. The results showed no significant difference in the amplitude and implicit times between the right and left
eyes so only the right eye was used for comparison between the MCI and control groups. The mean amplitude and implicit
times of the right eye of the MCI and control groups were 1.86±0.65 μV, 56.27±6.20 ms and 1.54±0.74 μV, 56.15±4.98 ms,
respectively. T-test showed no significant differences in pERG amplitudes and implicit times between MCI and the control
groups. In conclusion, our results may imply that the inner retina is intact in early MCI elderly subjects.
The aim of this study was to determine whether pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potential (PRVEP) is affected in mild
cognitive impairment (MCI). Participants aged ≥ 60 years diagnosed as MCI were invited to participate in a study together
with a group of controls. PRVEP was measured using A RETI-port/Scan 21 and stimuli of large and small checks sizes,
1° (60 min of arc) and 0.25° (15 min) respectively were used to obtain responses. The amplitude and implicit times of
the MCI and control groups were then compared. A total of 18 MCI participants (age 65.7 ± 3.1 years) and 18 controls
(65.1 ± 3.8 years) consented to participate in the study. The amplitude and implicit times for the MCI group using the
target sizes of 60 min of arc were 9.80 ± 4.06 µV and 108.83 ± 7.63 ms and for 30 min of arc were 11.00 ± 7.44 µV
and 123.96 ± 6.18 ms respectively. Consecutively for the control groups the amplitudes and implicit times were 8.96 ±
3.52µV, 105.85 ± 3.60 ms and 11.97± 6.11 µV, 122.57 ± 8.28 ms. PRVEP results did not reveal significant differences in
P100-wave amplitude nor implicit time between the two groups under investigation. This study concluded that the visual
pathway of MCI participants may be unaffected in the early part of the disease process.