METHODS: In line with the 2020 Asian Organization for Crohn's and Colitis annual meeting, a multinational web-based survey about Asian physicians' perspectives on IBD was conducted.
RESULTS: A total of 384 Asian physicians (99 in China, 93 in Japan, 110 in Korea, and 82 in other Asian countries/regions) treating IBD patients from 24 countries/regions responded to the survey. Most respondents were gastroenterologists working in an academic teaching hospital. About half of them had more than 10 years of clinical experience in caring for patients with IBD. The European Crohn's Colitis Organisation guideline was used most commonly for the diagnosis of IBD except for Japanese physicians who preferred their own national guideline. The Mayo score and Crohn's Disease Activity Index were the most commonly used activity scoring systems for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. Endoscopy, not surprisingly, was the main investigation in assessing the extent and activity of IBD. On the other hand, there were disparities across countries/regions with regard to the favored modalities of small bowel and perianal evaluation of Crohn's disease, as well as the use of serologic markers.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present survey revealed practical behaviors of Asian physicians in the diagnosis of IBD. Investigating the reasons for different diagnostic approaches among countries/regions might help us develop Asian guidelines further.
Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 600 patients with HF with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <40%) with ≥1 sacubitril/valsartan prescription were identified by reviewing patient-level medical records at six academic tertiary hospitals in Korea between February 2017 and April 2019.
Results: At baseline, 59.2%, 28.3%, 4.8%, and 7.7% of the patients received low (50 mg bid), moderate (100 mg bid), target (200 mg bid), and unconventional dose of sacubitril/valsartan, respectively. Patients with low and moderate doses experienced either 'no-titration' (39.8%) or 'stable up-titration' (41.5%). At 12 months, 31.7%, 28.5%, 24.8%, and 15% received low, moderate, target doses, and unconventional dose, respectively. On follow-up, 31 (5.2%) patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan. The time-averaged N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level decreased from 879.6 to 406 pg/mL (ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.5). The mean LVEF increased by 10.4±12.2% from 27.2±5.8 to 36.3±11.1%, whereas LV end-diastolic volume index decreased by 18.7±26.1 mL/m2 from 114.5±37.7 mL/m2 to 98.9±42.3 mL/m2 at baseline and follow-up, respectively.
Conclusions: In real-world practice, 95% patients started with low and moderate doses of sacubitril/valsartan. Many patients experienced dose up-titration during follow-up; 30% reached the target dose. Cardiac reverse remodelling was reflected by a profound NT-proBNP level and LV size reduction, and LVEF increment. This study confirms the gap in treatment patterns between clinical trials and real-world practice.