METHODS: This study recruited 21 ALS patients, 19 age-matched PD patients, and 21 agematched healthy controls. Patient demographics and clinical scores relating to the respective diseases were documented. The RNFL thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and after 6 months.
RESULTS: At baseline, the RNFL in the superior quadrant was significantly thinner in the patients with ALS than in healthy controls (109.90±22.41 µm vs. 127.81±17.05 µm [mean±standard deviation], p=0.008). The RNFL thickness did not differ significantly between the ALS and PD patients or between the PD patients and healthy controls. At 6 months, there was further significant RNFL thinning in patients with ALS, for both the overall thickness (baseline: median=94.5 µm, range=83.0-106.0 µm; follow-up: median=93.5 µm, range=82.5-104.5 µm, p=0.043) and the thickness in the inferior quadrant (median=126 µm, range=109.5-142.5 µm; and median=117.5 µm, range=98.5-136.5 µm; respectively, p=0.032). However, these changes were not correlated with the ALS functional scores. In contrast, the patients with PD did not demonstrate a significant change in RNFL thickness between the two time points.
CONCLUSIONS: The RNFL thickness is a promising biomarker of disease progression in patients with ALS but not in those with PD, which has a slower disease progression.
METHODS: We investigated the frequency and correlates of OH, symptomatic OH, and neurogenic OH, in a large consecutively recruited PD cohort (n = 318), and compared the diagnostic performance of the sit-to-stand vs. the supine-to-stand blood pressure (BP) test. We evaluated the utility of continuous BP monitoring and tilt table testing in patients with postural symptoms or falls who were undetected to have OH with clinic-based BP measurements. Disease severity, fluid intake, orthostatic and overactive bladder symptoms, falls, comorbidities and medication history were evaluated.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 66.1 ± 9.5years, with mean disease duration 7.8 ± 5.5years. OH frequency was 35.8 % based on the supine-to-stand test. OH in PD was significantly associated with older age, lower body mass index, longer disease duration, worse motor, cognitive and overactive bladder symptoms and functional disabilities, falls, and lower fluid intake. A similar profile was seen with asymptomatic OH. Three quarters of OH were neurogenic, with the majority also having supine hypertension. The sit-to-stand test had a sensitivity of only 0.39. One quarter of patients were additionally diagnosed with OH during continuous BP monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: The sit-to-stand test substantially underdiagnoses OH in PD, with the important practice implication that supine-to-stand measurements may be preferred. Screening for OH is warranted even in asymptomatic patients. Adequate fluid intake, treatment of urinary dysfunction and falls prevention are important strategies in managing PD patients with OH.
METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, 280 patients with PD were screened, and 72 eligible patients were block-randomized (1:1) to receive either multistrain probiotics capsules (n = 34) or identical-appearing placebo (n = 38), for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the average number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) per week during the last 2 weeks of intervention compared with the 2-week preintervention phase, recorded by daily stool diary. Secondary outcome measures included changes in stool consistency, constipation severity score, and quality of life related to constipation. Satisfaction with intervention received was assessed. Change in levels of fecal calprotectin, a marker of intestinal inflammation, was an exploratory outcome.
RESULTS: SBM increased by 1.0 ± 1.2 per week after treatment with probiotics and decreased by 0.3 ± 1.0 per week in the placebo group (mean difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.8, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were also seen for secondary outcomes after correction for multiple comparisons, including stool consistency (p = 0.009) and quality of life related to constipation (p = 0.001). In the treatment group, 65.6% reported satisfaction with the intervention vs only 21.6% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). One patient (2.9%) in the treatment group withdrew due to a nonserious adverse event. Fecal calprotectin did not change significantly during the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Multistrain probiotics treatment was effective for constipation in PD. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of probiotics in PD, as well as their mechanisms of action.
CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03377322.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that, for people with PD, multistrain probiotics significantly increased the average number of SBM per week.