Displaying publications 21 - 40 of 156 in total

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D
    Aust N Z J Med, 1999 Apr;29(2):207-13.
    PMID: 10342019
    BACKGROUND: The information needs of ethnic minorities often differ from that of the dominant culture, leading to dissatisfaction among both patients and health professionals.

    AIMS: This research project aims to identify attitudes towards cancer and associated information and communication needs of Chinese patients and their relatives in Sydney, thereby providing a framework for the provision of culturally appropriate cancer care for Chinese-Australians.

    METHODS: A qualitative data collection strategy was selected as the most appropriate method, because no validated measures are available and no previous research has examined attitudes and needs of Chinese-Australian cancer patients. Patients were recruited from three major teaching hospitals in Sydney and from a Chinese cancer support organisation. Sampling was discontinued when informational redundancy was achieved. Four focus groups and 26 individual telephone interviews were conducted with a total of 36 cancer patients and 12 relatives born in China, Singapore and Malaysia.

    RESULTS: While individual differences were observed, a majority view was expressed on a range of issues. Non-disclosure of a poor prognosis was favoured, and the role of the family in liaising between health professionals and the patient was emphasised. Patients preferred a confident and clear diagnosis and treatment recommendation. Most patients wished to incorporate Chinese culture-specific treatments into their care. The need for interpreters and psychological and spiritual support was emphasised.

    CONCLUSIONS: Providing information in a culturally sensitive manner will assist doctors in providing optimum care and support for ethnic minority groups in this country.

    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology
  2. AIDS, 1999 Jul 30;13(11):UNAIDS 1-UNAIDS 13.
    PMID: 10449273
    A meeting was organized by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Japanese National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) with the following objectives: (i) to discuss public health and economic rationale to accelerate the development and evaluation of HIV vaccines suitable for use in Asia; (ii) to review ongoing preclinical HIV vaccine research in Asia; (iii) to review the Asian experience in conducting clinical trials of HIV candidate vaccines; (iv) to explore possibilities for international collaboration between countries in the region and with other countries and institutions; and (v) to discuss issues related to availability of future effective HIV vaccines. The meeting was attended by participants from Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, South Korea, Thailand, United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The HIV epidemic in Asia is rapidly spreading and has already resulted in a total of 7 million HIV infections in the region. The epidemic already has a significant public health and economic impact, which may be worse in the future, unless effective intervention programmes are successfully implemented. A safe, effective, and affordable vaccine should be considered as the best hope for a long-term solution to the HIV epidemic in Asia. Asian scientists and institutions have established a number of international collaborations to isolate and characterize prevalent HIV-1 strains (mostly belonging to subtypes C and E) and are developing candidate vaccines based on these subtypes. In the region, phase I/II clinical trials of preventative HIV candidate vaccines have been conducted in Australia, China and Thailand. Since 1993, a comprehensive National AIDS Vaccine Plan has allowed Thailand to conduct phase I/II trials of six different preventative or therapeutic candidate vaccines, and the first phase III preventative efficacy trial has been approved. The meeting identified both the needs and the opportunities to intensify international collaboration to accelerate the development of HIV vaccines in Asia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  3. Merican MI
    Med J Malaysia, 2000 Jun;55(2):159-63.
    PMID: 19839142
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic/standards*; Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics
  4. Bhattachary-Chatterjee M, Nath Baral R, Chatterjee SK, Das R, Zeytin H, Chakraborty M, et al.
    Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2000 Jun;49(3):133-41.
    PMID: 10881692
    Anti-idiotype (Id) vaccine therapy has been tested and shown to be effective, in several animal models, for triggering the immune system to induce specific and protective immunity against bacterial, viral and parasitic infections. The administration of anti-Id antibodies as surrogate tumor-associated antigens (TAA) also represents another potential application of the concept of the Id network. Limited experience in human trials using anti-Id to stimulate immunity against tumors has shown promising results. In this "counter-point" article, we discuss our own findings showing the potential of anti-Id antibody vaccines to be novel therapeutic approaches to various human cancers and also discuss where anti-Id vaccines may perform better than traditional multiple-epitope antigen vaccines.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  5. Merican I
    Med J Malaysia, 2000 Aug;55 Suppl B:35-7.
    PMID: 11125519
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic/methods
  6. Khalid BA
    Med J Malaysia, 2000 Aug;55 Suppl B:14-6.
    PMID: 11125514
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  7. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee M, Chatterjee SK, Foon KA
    Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther., 2001 Feb;3(1):63-9.
    PMID: 11249733
    Certain anti-idiotypic antibodies that bind to the antigen-combining sites of antibodies can effectively mimic the three-dimensional structures and functions of the external antigens and can be used as surrogate antigens for active specific immunotherapy. Extensive studies in animal models have demonstrated the efficacy of these vaccines for triggering the immune system to induce specific and protective immunity against bacterial, viral and parasitic infections as well as tumors. Several monoclonal anti-idiotype antibodies that mimic distinct human tumor-associated antigens have been developed and characterized. Encouraging results have been obtained in recent clinical trials using these anti-idiotype antibodies as vaccines. In this article, we will review the current literature and discuss the potential of this novel therapeutic approach for various human cancers.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  8. Amudha K, Wong LP, Choy AM, Lang CC
    Curr Pharm Des, 2003;9(21):1691-701.
    PMID: 12871202
    Physiological and pharmacological responses may be influenced by ethnicity as a result of genetic factors, environmental factors and/or their interaction. This review is divided into 2 parts. Firstly, there will be overview of ethnicity as a determinant of drug metabolism and response with reference to antihypertensive agents. The concept of ethnicity has been applied extensively to the study of hypertension especially in American blacks in whom the hypertension is more common and more aggressive. Thus, the second part of this review will then focus on examining the black-white differences in physiological responses to pharmacological challenge that may provide a link between these models and known ethnic differences in drug responses. We will discuss the hypertension studies that have examined the relative effectiveness of different classes of antihypertensive agents including several recent cardiovascular outcome trials that either have a high proportion of blacks or were conducted entirely in black subjects.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  9. Ong HT, Cheah JS
    N Z Med J, 2004 Feb 20;117(1189):U773.
    PMID: 15014562
    Numerous trials and meta-analyses have been conducted over the last five years to identify an ideal anti-hypertensive drug. These reports, and the JNC 7 and European hypertension guidelines, have generated some controversy and confusion. A review of the comparative anti-hypertensive drug trials shows that the differences between drugs are minor and not consistently demonstrated by different studies. However, much data have now accumulated on the safety and value of diuretics, beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in reducing blood pressure and preventing clinical disease. The importance of tight blood pressure control in reducing adverse events has been clearly shown, and clinicians should concentrate on achieving target blood pressure levels, which often requires a combination of anti-hypertensive drugs. The choice of anti-hypertensive drug should be guided by the presence of concomitant clinical disease, as evidence has accumulated on the special efficacy of certain drugs in reducing damage to particular organ systems. In the absence of any associated clinical disease, it is good to initiate anti-hypertensive therapy with diuretics, provided the metabolic parameters are regularly reviewed.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  10. Azhar MZ
    Med J Malaysia, 2004 Jun;59(2):143-5.
    PMID: 15559161
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic*
  11. Hattori R, Matsubara H
    Mol Cell Biochem, 2004 Sep;264(1-2):151-5.
    PMID: 15544044
    Conventional therapies for severe ischemic heart disease are limited in applicability. While several angiogenesis researches have shown novel efficacy, safety and feasibility for clinical use, recently we have started the clinical trial of a sole cell therapy using autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells transplantation targeted into ischemic hibernating myocardium. Here, we review the background of bone marrow cell research and introduce therapeutic angiogenesis for severe ischemic heart disease by autologous bone marrow cells transplantation.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  12. Yusoff K
    Med J Malaysia, 2005 Jun;60(2):239-45.
    PMID: 16114170
    ALLHAT study is the biggest randomized clinical trial in hypertension ever conducted. Its objective was to ompare the efficacy of newer (calcium channel blocker amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor inopril) to the older (diuretic chlorthalidone) antihypertensive agents in the treatment of patients with hypertension. After enrolling 42,000 patients who were followed for an average of 4.9 years, ALLHAT did not find significant differences in the primary end-points between these antihypertenive agents. ALLHAT however found significant differences in the secondary end-points such as heart failure and strokes between chlorthalidone and amlodipine or lisinopril. Based on these and on economic reasons, the investigators unequivocally recommended diuretics as the first line therapy for hypertension. Since its publication, ALLHAT has been much discussed, debated A and opined. The choice of drugs for study, the study design, the conduct of the study and the conclusions drawn by the investigators had all been criticised or controversial. Yet ALLHAT has been widely quoted, commented upon or referred to and it has been instrumental in initiating the JNC VII Guidelines. Thus a thorough understanding of ALLHAT is necessary for clinical practice and in designing and evaluating clinical trials in the future. Moving Points: in Medicine will capture the essence of ALLHAT, discusses its implications to clinical trials and explores its possible impact on the practice of medicine in this country.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  13. Sharmila S
    Med J Malaysia, 2005 Jul;60 Suppl B:136-7.
    PMID: 16108195
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  14. Ong HT
    QJM, 2005 Aug;98(8):599-614.
    PMID: 16006501
    The landmark HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) studies have practical lessons for clinicans. The 4S trial established the importance of treating the hypercholesterolaemic patient with cardiovascular heart disease. Next, WOSCOPS showed the benefit of treating healthy, high-risk hypercholesterolaemic men. CARE, a secondary prevention trial, showed the benefit of treating patients with cholesterol levels within normal limits. This was confirmed by the LIPID trial, another secondary prevention study, which enrolled patients with cholesterol levels 155-271 mg/dl (4-7 mmol/l). The importance of treating patients with established ischaemic heart disease, and those at high risk of developing heart disease, regardless of cholesterol level, was being realized. In the MIRACL trial, hypocholesterolaemic therapy was useful in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, while the AVERT study showed that aggressive statin therapy is as good as angioplasty in reducing ischaemic events in patients with stable angina. By showing the value of fluvastatin after percutaneous intervention, LIPS confirmed that benefit is a class action of the statins. The HPS randomized over 20 000 patients, and showed beyond doubt the value of statins in reducing cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient. Although PROSPER showed benefit in treating the elderly patients above 70 years, statin therapy in this trial was associated with an increase in cancer incidence. The comparative statin trials, PROVE-IT, REVERSAL, Phase Z of the A to Z, ALLIANCE and TNT, all showed that high-dose statins will better reduce cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient, although the adverse effects of therapy will also be increased. ALLHAT-LLT, ASCOT-LLA and CARDS showed that for statin therapy to demonstrate a significant benefit, hypertensive or diabetic patients must be at sufficiently high risk of cardiovascular events. The emphasis is now on the risk level for developing cardiovascular events, and treatment should target the high-risk group and not the lipid level of the patient. No therapy is free of adverse effect. Treatment of those most at risk will bring the most benefit; treatment of those not at high risk of cardiovascular disease may expose patients who would not benefit much from therapy to its adverse effects.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  15. Ong HT, Cheah JS
    MedGenMed, 2005;7(2):74.
    PMID: 16369452
    The hypertensive patient with type 2 diabetes is especially at risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) studies suggested that treatment to a lower target blood pressure resulted in better prevention of clinical disease in these patients. Most trials comparing antihypertensive drugs have shown only minimal differences between the various agents. The evidence from the trials suggests that diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and the angiotensin-receptor antagonists (ARBs) will all successfully reduce adverse clinical events. The largest of the comparative hypertensive drug trials, the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), demonstrated that a diuretic has a better hypotensive effect, and was more successful in preventing many aspects of cardiovascular disease compared with CCBs and ACE inhibitors. The importance of good blood pressure control and the general equivalence of antihypertensive drugs were again shown in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, which compared an ARB with a CCB. Choice of antihypertensive agent should be individualized and guided by the presence of concomitant clinical disease and the need to protect any specific target organ system in the diabetic hypertensive. Diuretics, being potent hypotensive drugs with clearly demonstrated clinical benefit, should form part of the antihypertensive regimen of most diabetic hypertensives. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are especially useful in preventing nephropathy. Most patients will require a combination of antihypertensive drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control of under 130/80 mm Hg in the diabetic hypertensive. The clinician should concentrate on seeking this lower target blood pressure rather than be excessively concerned about which is the best antihypertensive agent.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  16. Hilmi I, Goh KL
    Chin J Dig Dis, 2006;7(1):1-6.
    PMID: 16412030 DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00236.x
    Colorectal carcinoma is one of the commonest solid organ tumors in the world and its prevalence appears to be increasing in Asia. Recently, there has been much interest in various chemotherapeutic agents for the management of this condition, in particular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). There is a large amount of data that suggest traditional NSAIDs, as well as the new cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors such as rofecoxib and celecoxib, have a role in the setting of primary and secondary prevention, and adjuvant therapy of both sporadic colorectal carcinoma and familial adenomatous polyposis. This review examines some of this data, as well as the potential problems and limitations of using these agents, particularly in light of the recent withdrawal of rofecoxib.
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  17. Citation:
    MMC Guideline 009/2006: Clinical Trials and Biomedical Research. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Medical Council; 2006
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  18. Ong HT
    BMJ, 2007 May 5;334(7600):946-9.
    PMID: 17478848
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
  19. Ong HT
    J Fam Pract, 2007 Sep;56(9):727-34.
    PMID: 17764644
    Matched MeSH terms: Clinical Trials as Topic
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links