METHODS: A cross-sectional study of consecutive adult patients attending an open access endoscopy list for the primary indication of dyspepsia was conducted. Independent epidemiological and clinical factors for CSEF were determined prospectively.
RESULTS: Data for 1167/1208 (96.6 %) adults (mean age 49.7 ± 15.9 years, 42.4 % males, ethnic distribution: 30.5 % Malays, 36.9 % Chinese and 30.8 % Indians) were analysed between January 2007 and August 2008. Three-hundred and eight (26.4 %) patients were found to have CSEF, most often those with age ≥45 years (30.3 vs 19 %, P < 0.0001), male gender (34.1 vs 20.7 % female, P < 0.0001), lower education levels (i.e. primary or no education), smoking (36.7 vs 24.9 %, P = 0.003), H. pylori infection (40.6 vs 21.8 %, P < 0.0001), and duration of dyspepsia ≤5 months (32.8 vs 24.4 %, P = 0.006). Age ≥ 45 years (OR 1.82, 95 % CI = 1.38-2.48), male gender (OR 1.84, 95 % CI = 1.53-2.59), H. pylori infection (OR 2.36, 95 % CI = 1.83-3.26), and duration of dyspepsia ≤5 months (OR 1.44, 95 % CI = 1.13-2.03) were subsequently identified as independent risk factors for CSEF.
CONCLUSION: CSEF are found in 26.4 % of Asian adults with uninvestigated dyspepsia. Duration of symptoms <5 months, among other recognised factors, is predictive of CSEF.
METHODS: A large-scale prospective seroepidemiological study in West and East Malaysia using the HEL-p II commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (AMRAD, Melbourne, Australia) to detect H. pylori antibodies. Populations surveyed in West Malaysia were a rural community from Kuala Pilah, and blood donors from Kuala Lumpur and Kota Baru. Subjects studied in East Malaysia were volunteer blood donors from Kota Kinabalu, and blood donors and healthy volunteers from Sibu. Statistical analyses using multiple logistic regression analysis were carried out to identify independent risk factors for H. pylori infection
RESULTS: A total of 2,381 subjects were evaluated. H. pylori prevalence varied from different areas of study and ranged from a low of 26.4% in blood donors from Kota Baru to a high of 55.0% in Kota Kinabalu. The most striking differences, however, were noted in the prevalence rates among different racial groups. Prevalence rates among the Malays ranged from 11.9 to 29.2%, while the Chinese ranged from 26.7 to 57.5%, and those of Indians in two studies were 49.4 and 52.3%. In every location, Malays had a significantly lower prevalence compared with the other races. The highest prevalence rates were recorded among the indigenous races in Kota Kinabalu, East Malaysia. There was no difference between males and females in the studies. An increasing trend with age was noted in the majority of studies; however, no increase in prevalence rates was noted among the Malays.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of infection in a multiracial population in Malaysia points to a 'racial cohort' phenomenon. The infection appears to be confined to a racial group, with the Malays having consistently low prevalence rates. This observation may provide clues to the mode of transmission of infection.