METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional observational study done from November 2017 until December 2017 at ED Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim (HSAH), a 650-bedded tertiary hospital in the state of Kedah. All patients that were triaged to red zone, age 18 years and above, and involved in intra-hospital transfer to critical coronary unit, intensive care unit and wards were included. All cases were documented in proforma by the accompanying staff.
RESULTS: Among the 170 critically ill patients, only 29 patients (17.1%) experienced adverse events during intra-hospital transfer. The adverse events seen were hypotension (12.4%), desaturation (3.5%) and dislodged peripheral line (2.4%). Cardiorespiratory related diagnosis was the commonest presentation. Intra-hospital transfer during morning shift and evening shift has 79.5% (b=-1.59, OR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.69, p=0.011) and 75.6% ((b=-1.41, OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.73, p=0.012) lesser odds of experiencing adverse events compare to night shift. Patients with vasopressor/inotropes had 9 times higher odds of experiencing adverse events during transportation, compared to patients with no vasopressor/inotropes (b=2.27, OR=9.70, 95% CI: 3.39, 27.72, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Critical care patients who are involved in intrahospital transfer were at risk of adverse events such as hypotension, desaturation and dislodge peripheral line. Risk identification and maintaining level of care is important to minimize the adverse events during transfer. Patients had higher rates of adverse events if they were transferred during night shifts and on inotropic/vasopressor support.
METHODS: We searched databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Google Scholar up to January 2021 and identified randomised controlled trials comparing ketorolac to any other medications in treating patients presenting with migraine headache.
RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included in our review, comprising of 944 participants. We derived seven comparisons; ketorolac versus phenothiazines, metoclopramide, sumatriptan, dexamethasone, sodium valproate, caffeine, and diclofenac. There were no significant differences in the reduction of pain intensity at 1-hour under the comparisons between ketorolac and phenothiazines (standard mean difference (SMD) 0.09, P 0.74), or metoclopramide (SMD 0.02, P 0.95). We also found no difference in the outcome recurrence of headache [ketorolac vs phenothiazines (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, P 0.97)], ability to return to work or usual activity [ketorolac vs metoclopramide (RR 0.64, P 0.13)], need for rescue medication [ketorolac vs phenothiazines (RR 1.72, P 0.27), ketorolac vs metoclopramide (RR 2.20, P 0.18)], and frequency of adverse effects [ketorolac vs metoclopramide (RR 1.07, P 0.82)]. Limited trials suggested that ketorolac offered better pain relief at 1-hour compared to sumatriptan and dexamethasone, had lesser frequency of adverse effects than phenothiazines, and was superior to sodium valproate in terms of reduction of pain intensity at 1-hour, need for rescue medication and sustained headache freedom within 24-hour.
CONCLUSIONS: Ketorolac may have similar efficacy to phenothiazines and metoclopramide in treating acute migraine headache. Ketorolac may also offer better pain control than sumatriptan, dexamethasone and sodium valproate. However, given the lack of evidence due to inadequate number of trials available, future studies are warranted.