METHODS: This is a prospective, randomised, crossover, single-blinded study conducted from February 2018 to February 2019 among adult subjects attending respiratory clinic Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC).
RESULTS: Forty-six subjects were recruited with 27 males (58.7%). The mean age was 54 (+11) year old. The baseline median Body Mass Index (BMI) was 34.2 kg/m2 (Interquartile Range IQR: 30.8 kg/m2 -41.7 kg/m2); baseline median AHI 28.8 /hour (IQR 21.2/hour-54.0/hour); andbaseline median ESS 15 (IQR 13-16). After intervention, the median AHI was 5.0 / hour (IQR 4.2/hour-6.0/hour) at fixed CPAP arm; APAP arm was 5.5/ hour (IQR 4.2/hour-6.3/hour); p<0.01. The median ESS at fixed CPAP arm was 2 (IQR 0-3); APAP arm was 2 (IQR 1-3); p < 0.01. Those who preferred APAP were 22 subjects (47.8%) and had median optimal CPAP pressure 13.0 cmH2O (IQR 12.0 cmH2O -13.5 cmH2O); 24 subjects (52.2%) who preferred Fixed CPAP had median optimal CPAP pressure 8.0 cmH2O (IQR 6.3 cmH2O -8.7 cmH2O); p<0.01. Median baseline BMI was 37.6 kg/m2 (IQR 30.8 kg/m2 -43.0 kg/m2) for those who preferred APAP and 32.3 kg/m2 (IQR 30.8 kg/m2 - 38.4 kg/m2) for subjects preferred Fixed CPAP; p=0.03.
DISCUSSION: Fixed CPAP maybe considered as first line therapy for symptomatic moderate and severe OSA with titrated optimal CPAP pressure less than 8 cmH2O and BMI less than 32.3 kg/m2; based on subjects' preference. Baseline AHI and average daily CPAP usage was not statisticallysignificant in affecting patient preference between fixed and auto adjusting CPAP. This is the first study of its kind conducted in Malaysia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among doctors and nurses in the medical department in Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia between November 18, 2020 and December 18, 2020 during the third wave of COVID-19 epidemic in Malaysia. We studied the knowledge and practice of preventive measures of COVID-19 among doctors and nurses in the COVID-19 or sudden acute respiratory infection (SARI) wards and general medical wards. Data was collected using a validated self-designed google form online-questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 407 subjects completed the study and 80.8% were females; 55.8% were aged between 30-39 years; 46.4% were medical doctors. The main source of COVID-19 knowledge was the Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) website (35.1%). Majority (97%) had sufficient knowledge and 82% practiced proper preventive measures. Doctors had a higher mean knowledge score compared to nurses (p < 0.001). HCWs working in COVID-19 or SARI wards scored higher in knowledge questions compared to those in the general medical wards (p = 0.020). Nurses practiced better preventive measures (p < 0.001). Good knowledge could not be predicted based on professions (OR: 0.222, 95% CI: 0.048 - 1.028, p = 0.054). Majority were unable to recall the proper steps of donning (85.8%) and doffing (98.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although majority had good knowledge and practiced proper preventive measures, there was a poor recall in donning and doffing steps regardless of place of practice. The MOH website is a useful platform for tailored continuous medical education and regular updates on COVID-19. Regular training and retraining on donning and doffing of PPE is needed to bridge this gap.
OBJECTIVE: To determine a standardised algorithm to reassess and personalise the treatment COPD patients based on the available evidence.
METHODS: A consensus statement was agreed upon by a panel of pulmonologists in from 11 institutes in Malaysia whose members formed this consensus group.
RESULTS: According to the consensus, which was unanimously adopted, all COPD patients who are currently receiving an ICS-based treatment should be reassessed based on the presence of co-existence of asthma or high eosinophil counts and frequency of moderate or severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months. When that the patients meet any of the aforementioned criteria, then the patient can continue taking ICS-based therapy. However, if the patients do not meet the criteria, then the treatment of patients need to be personalised based on whether the patient is currently receiving long-acting beta-agonists (LABA)/ICS or triple therapy.
CONCLUSION: A flowchart of the consensus providing a guidance to Malaysian clinicians was elucidated based on evidences and international guidelines that identifies the right patients who should receive inhaled corticosteroids and enable to switch non ICS based therapies in patients less likely to benefit from such treatments.