CASE REPORT: We described a case of extragonadal vaginal YST in a one year and seven months old girl who presented with vaginal discharge and bleeding, and discuss its differential diagnosis and potential pitfalls in immunohistochemistry. She was found to have a suprapubic mass on examination. The serum alpha fetoprotein was 11919.4 ng/mL. Computed tomography of the pelvis revealed a large 6.4 cm heterogenous pelvic mass. Colposcopic examination of the pelvis showed a fungating vaginal mass that was subsequently confirmed as a yolk sac tumour. Immunohistochemically, the malignant cells were positive toward CKAE1/AE3, AFP and glypican-3, as well as CD117.
DISCUSSION: Solid pattern extragonadal vaginal YST may morphologically resemble dysgerminoma that is also CD117 positive, while the glandular pattern YST may have clear cytoplasm and is positive for cytokeratin; hence, may resemble clear cell carcinoma. Being mindful of these potential diagnostic caveats is necessary to prevent misdiagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all HMs cases diagnosed in our centre over a six-year period. p57 immunohistochemistry stain was performed. Only nuclear immunoreactivity in >50% of cytotrophoblasts and villous stromal cells was regarded as positive for p57. DNA ploidy status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. A total of 250 cells from five chorionic villi were counted and were scored as diploid or triploid if more than 10% of nuclei demonstrated two or three signals, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 51 cases originally diagnosed by histomorphology as complete mole (n = 18), partial mole (n = 24) and non-molar abortus (n = 9) were recruited. The cases were reclassified based on the p57 immunostaining pattern and DNA ploidy status, into 27 complete moles (p57-/diploid), 9 partial moles (p57+/triploid) and 15 non-molar abortus (p57+/diploid). The diagnostic accuracy by histomorphological features alone in each category: complete moles, partial moles and non-molar abortus was 78.4%, 70.6% and 88.2% respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of the utility of combined p57 immunostain and DNA ploidy analysis in arriving at an accurate diagnosis in HMs. An algorithmic approach utilising these ancillary techniques is advocated in routine diagnostic workup for a more refined diagnostic approach to HMs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An interventional study was carried out among oesophageal and gastric cancer patients who had undergone surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Malaysia. The prehabilitation process took a maximum of two weeks, depending on the patient's optimisation before surgery. The prehabilitation is based on functional capacity (ECOG performance status), muscle function (handgrip strength), cardio-respiratory function (peak flow meter) and nutritional status (calorie and protein). Postoperative outcomes are measured based on the length of hospital stay, complications, and Clavien-Dindo Classification.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were recruited to undergo a prehabilitation intervention prior to gastrectomy (n=21) and esophagectomy (n=10). Demographically, most of the cancer patients were males (67.7%) with an ideal mean of BMI (23.5±6.0). Physically, the majority of them had physical class (ASA grade) Grade 2 (67.7%), ECOG performance status of 1 (61.3%) and SGA grade B (51.6%). The functional capacity and nutritional status showed a significant improvement after one week of prehabilitation interventions: peak expiratory flow meter (p<0.001), handgrip (p<0.001), ECOG performance (p<0.001), walking distance (p<0.001), incentive spirometry (p<0.001), total body calorie (p<0.001) and total body protein (p=0.004). However, those patients who required two weeks of prehabilitation for optimization showed only significant improvement in peak expiratory flow meter (p<0.001), handgrip (p<0.001), and incentive spirometry (p<0.001). Prehabilitation is significantly associated postoperatively with the length of hospital stay (p=0.028), complications (p=0.011) and Clavien-Dindo Classification (p=0.029).
CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation interventions significantly increase the functional capacity and nutritional status of cancer patients preoperatively; concurrently reducing hospital stays and complications postoperatively. However, certain cancer patients might require over two weeks of prehabilitation to improve the patient's functional capacity and reduce complications postoperatively.