METHODS: The researchers conducted an in-depth focus group discussion in September 2022 involving seven participants representing key stakeholders in vaccine compensations from governmental agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and private institutions who were experts in litigation and legislation, consumer protection, and medical practices in Malaysia. The study utilised ATLAS.ti 22 to conduct a thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: The analysis yielded three themes: existing mechanisms and their challenges, the role of ADR, and the solution for a vaccine injury compensation mechanism. The participants shared their knowledge and experience regarding the existing vaccine compensation mechanisms in Malaysia, i.e. the common law of Tort and Consumer Protection Act 1999, and explained how each mechanism relates to specific challenges or arguments that provide the basis on which they are unable to accord fair compensation to the vaccine recipients. The participants debated the merits and disadvantages of the types of ADR for AEFI and unanimously proposed a specific healthcare centre for compensation (SHCC) as the most viable compensation mechanism for AEFI.
CONCLUSION: SHCC offers a new ADR to serve as a compensation mechanism for claimants affected by the COVID-19 vaccines while also contributing to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16: peace, justice, and strong institutions.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Malaysia. Data were collected from November 2014 to January 2015 with a total of 58 respondents who met the inclusion criteria. The respondents received a 20-min one-on-one education programme regarding coronary heart disease, treatment and prevention, and healthy lifestyle. A questionnaire comprising demographic data was administered and the cardiovascular health index was measured before and after four weeks of the education programme. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: There were statistically significant decreases in the score of anxiety, stress, depression, body mass index, and smoking status (P < 0.001) between pre-test and post-test.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the one-on-one education programme could improve the cardiovascular health index of patients with MI. Furthermore, nurses need to develop and implement a standard education structure programme for patients with MI to improve health outcomes.