METHOD: A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the potential impact of isometric exercise on IOP and OPP. The literature on the relationship between isometric resistance exercise and IOP was systematically searched according to the "Cochrane Handbook" in the databases of Pubmed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Scopus through December 31, 2020. The search terms used were "exercise," "train," "isometric," "intraocular pressure," and "ocular perfusion pressure," and the mean differences of the data were analyzed using the Stata 16.0 software, with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, which included 268 adult participants consisting of 162 men and 106 women, were selected. All the exercise programs that were included were isometric resistance exercises of the lower limbs with intervention times of 1min, 2min, or 6min. The increase in IOP after intervention was as follows: I2=87.1%, P=0.001 using random-effects model combined statistics, SMD=1.03 (0.48, 1.59), and the increase in OPP was as follows: I2=94.5%, P=0.001 using random-effects model combined statistics, SMD=2.94 (1.65, 4.22), with both results showing high heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION: As isometric exercise may cause an increase in IOP and OPP, therefore, people with glaucoma and related high risk should perform isometric exercise with caution.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: All adult patients with patent osteotomies post-external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) or post-endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) for NLDO were included in this cross-sectional investigation. Patients with dry eye and endoscopically unidentified osteotomy sites were excluded from the study. The FDDT grade, EDTT and lacrimal symptom questionnaire (Lac-Q) scores were documented for all patients.
RESULTS: This study included 39 patients. Nineteen had undergone EDCR, twenty Ex-DCR. The FDDT grade and EDTT were positively correlated (r=0.32, P=0.045). The mean Lac-Q score was not correlated with FDDT grade (r=-0.01, P=0.951) or EDTT (r=0.07, P=0.669). There were no significant differences in the FDDT grade, EDTT, Lac-Q score or ostial characteristics between Ex-DCR and EDCR.
CONCLUSION: FDDT grading correlates with EDTT, suggesting that these tests may be used interchangeably based on the clinician's ease of access and instrumentation. There was no correlation between the symptoms of lacrimal outflow obstruction with objective evidence of drainage.