Displaying all 9 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Harwant S
    Med J Malaysia, 2004 Dec;59 Suppl F:2.
    PMID: 15941152
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  2. Deshmukh RG, Thevarajan K, Kok CS, Sivapathasundaram N, George SV
    J Arthroplasty, 1998 Feb;13(2):197-9.
    PMID: 9526214
    Revision arthroplasty of the hip is often complicated by infection, bone loss, and perioperative fracture of the femur. A simple, inexpensive spacer that keeps tissue planes intact and prevents soft tissue contracture during the interoperative period of a 2-stage revision is described. This can provide intramedullary support to a fractured or weak femur and enable local antibiotic delivery, as well as permit limited mobilization of the patient. It can be easily fabricated during surgery using universally available materials and can be tailored for specific requirements. Such a spacer was used in 5 cases. The experience is presented, and the technique and pitfalls are discussed.
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  3. Sivananthan S, Arif M, Choon DS
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2003 Dec;11(2):148-53.
    PMID: 14676339
    To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome in patients undergoing small stem Exeter total hip replacement.
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  4. Park KS, Seon JK, Lee KB, Kim SK, Chan CK, Yoon TR
    J Arthroplasty, 2017 02;32(2):503-509.
    PMID: 27546473 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.010
    BACKGROUND: This study aims at determining the average long-term result of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook (ARRH) and bone grafting in severe acetabular bony defect. Expected 15-year survival of ARRH in revision THA is included in the study.

    METHODS: Retrospective review of 48 patients (48 hips) with follow-up duration of average 11.4 years (range, 6.1-21.4 years) was conducted. At each follow-up, Harris hip score was used to assess functional outcome, and radiographic acetabular component osteolysis was measured by DeLee and Charnley classification. Bone defects were assessed preoperatively and intraoperatively using American academy of orthopedic surgeons and Paprosky classification. The common modes of ARRH failures were evaluated. Bone consolidation, presence of heterotopic ossification, and complications such as infection and dislocation were recorded.

    RESULTS: The bone defects were varied and included cavitary, segmental, and combined defects without any pelvic discontinuity. Mean Harris hip score improved from 52.6 points preoperatively to 82.0 points postoperatively. Nine acetabular revisions and 3 stem revisions (2 concurrent with acetabular revisions and 1 isolated stem revision) were performed. There were 5 infected cases and 1 patient with recurrent dislocation. The 11.4-year survival of revision THA with ARRH was 71% as the end point for acetabular revision surgery for any reason. The expected 15-year survival of revision THA with ARRH was 60%. The most common failure mode of ARRH was superomedial migration followed by lateral migration.

    CONCLUSION: ARRH combined with bone grafting produces relatively good average long-term clinical results.

    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  5. Chan CK, Lee DH, Yoon TR, Park KS
    J Orthop Sci, 2019 09;24(5):936-938.
    PMID: 28390755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.03.010
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  6. Abbas AA, Kim YJ, Song EK, Yoon TR
    J Arthroplasty, 2009 Oct;24(7):1144.e5-8.
    PMID: 18848418 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.008
    The causes of groin pain after total hip arthroplasty are numerous, and the condition itself is disabling. Therefore, it is imperative that the cause of the pain is identified and managed appropriately. We report a case where the patient had groin pain after total hip arthroplasty as a result of an oversized cementless acetabular component, which caused a breach in the anterior wall of the acetabulum. The anterior wall of the acetabulum was reconstructed with femoral head allograft, and the patient has been symptom free since.
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  7. Mohamad JA, Kwan MK, Merican AM, Abbas AA, Kamari ZH, Hisa MK, et al.
    Med J Malaysia, 2004 Dec;59 Suppl F:3-7.
    PMID: 15941153
    We report our early experience of 20 cases of metal on metal articulation total hip arthroplasty in 19 young patients. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (63%) was the commonest diagnosis for patients undergoing this procedure, followed by osteoarthritis (21%). In general, most of the patients were young and physically active with an average age of 43.1 years (range, 25 to 58 years). The average follow-up period was 18 months (range, 7 to 46 months). The mean total Harris Hip Score preoperatively and at final follow-up was 31 points and 89 points respectively. The mean total Pain Score improved from an average of 11.5 to 41.1 points at final follow-up. Sixteen (84%) of the patients had a good to excellent hip score. There was one dislocation, which stabilized after reduction and conservative management. One case of early infection underwent a two-staged revision.
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  8. Park KS, Chan CK, Kim SK, Li QS, Im CJ, Yoon TR
    J Orthop Sci, 2019 May;24(3):452-457.
    PMID: 30415823 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.016
    BACKGROUND: Due to concern of potential metallosis caused by residual microscopic ceramic particles, metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing is deemed undesirable in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for ceramic bearing fracture. We determined whether MoM bearing is suitable to be used in revision THA for ceramic fractures and also evaluated whether this treatment increases serum iron levels compared with MoM bearing revision THA for polyethylene failure.

    METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 22 patients underwent revision surgery using MoM bearing (28 mm femoral head in 18 hips and 32 mm in 4 hips) for ceramic bearing fracture and followed average 52.1 months. We assessed radiological parameter and functional outcome using Harris hip score (HHS) and WOMAC score. Also, serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) blood tests were performed and compared with the result obtained from age, sex- and follow-up duration-matched patients with MoM revision THA for failed polyethylene bearing.

    RESULTS: The mean HHS improved from 60.6 preoperatively to 90.3 at final follow-up. There were no changes in cup position, progression of osteolytic lesions, and measurable wear of MoM bearing articulation at final follow-up radiographs. There was one case of recurrent dislocation after surgery, which was treated with greater trochanter distal advancement and one case of deep infection, which underwent two-stage revision. Mean serum Co level (1.7 vs. 1.4 μg/dl; p = 0.211) and Cr level (0.70 vs. 1.01 μg/dl; p = 0.327) showed no significant difference.

    CONCLUSIONS: MoM articulation with liner cementation into the acetabular cup along with total synovectomy can be chosen in revision surgery for ceramic fracture with good midterm follow-up. However, the use of MoM bearing is indicated when the stem and metal shell can be retained and ceramic on ceramic or ceramic on polyethylene bearing cannot be selected. Also long-term outcome needs to be further evaluated.

    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
  9. Baharuddin MY, Salleh ShH, Zulkifly AH, Lee MH, Noor AM, A Harris AR, et al.
    PMID: 24484753 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-30
    Minimal available information concerning hip morphology is the motivation for several researchers to study the difference between Asian and Western populations. Current use of a universal hip stem of variable size is not the best option for all femur types. This present study proposed a new design process of the cementless femoral stem using a three dimensional model which provided more information and accurate analysis compared to conventional methods.
    Matched MeSH terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links