Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Loo CY, Mohamed Said MS, Mohd R, Abdul Gafor AH, Saidin R, Halim NA, et al.
    Transfus Apher Sci, 2010 Dec;43(3):335-40.
    PMID: 21051293 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2010.10.003
    This was a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of immunoadsorption (IA) versus conventional PP (PP) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of severe lupus nephritis (LN). Of 28 patients with biopsy-proven severe LN (ISN/RPS classes III or IV ± V), 14 underwent 36 sessions of PP and the other 41 sessions of IA in addition to our center's standard LN treatment protocol. Three patients in the PP group and 2 in the IA group experienced a transient, marked drop in platelets with the second session. Except for a higher pre treatment mean SLEDAI score in the PP group 17.4 ± 2.0 vs. 13.5 ± 4.8; p = 0.009 and a serum creatinine of 163 ± 7.9 vs. 81.7 ± 10.2; p = 0.33, there were no other baseline differences. Some differences did exist between the two therapies in the immediate post-treatment phase, at 1 and 3 months. Three in IA relapsed, none of PP in third months, whereas two patients relapsed in the PP and none of IA cohorts at 6 months. However, most of these parameters did not differ by 6 months. The pre- and post-therapy SLEDAI scores remained different 12.4 ± 4.5 vs. 9 ± 4; p = 0.04 at 1 month, and at 3 month 13.5 ± 4.7 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1; p = 0.012 but not at 6 months. We conclude that IA and PP were equally well tolerated and efficacious as adjunctive therapy for severe LN.
    Matched MeSH terms: Lupus Nephritis/therapy*
  2. Yeap SS, Asarudin SI, Chow SK, Chua CT, Lai LC
    Med J Malaysia, 2002 Sep;57(3):311-8.
    PMID: 12440271
    The best therapeutic choice in the treatment of lupus nephritis remains open to debate. In addition, there have been little data on the treatment of lupus nephritis in Asian patients. The objective of this study was to look at the response rate and complications of treatment given for lupus nephritis in a group of South East Asian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 103 patients with lupus nephritis. Detailed analysis was done on 58 patients with Class IV disease. The median time to remission was 12.1 months for azathioprine (AZA), 15.01 months for oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) and 15.25 months for intravenous (i.v.) CPM. The percentage of patients achieving remission after the first course of treatment was 42.9% with AZA, 83.3% with oral CPM and 90.9% with i.v. CPM. Overall, 41/58 (70.7%) of patients went into remission following the first course of treatment. Seventeen (41.5%) subsequently relapsed, requiring a second course of treatment. Fifty-two (50.5%) of all patients had drug-related complications from their treatment. The most frequent complication for the group was amenorrhoea (23.3% of all patients, 40% of those who had CPM previously), which was significantly more frequent in patients given CPM. In conclusion, more patients achieve remission when treated with CPM compared with AZA alone but this is associated with a higher complication rate, especially amenorrhoea.
    Matched MeSH terms: Lupus Nephritis/therapy*
  3. Go KW, Teo SM
    Med J Malaysia, 2006 Oct;61(4):447-50.
    PMID: 17243522
    Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease with renal involvement being one of the most frequent and serious manifestations of the disease. The aim of the study is to analyze the treatment and renal outcome of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) WHO class III and IV on cyclophosphamide (CYC). We retrospectively identified 41 patients with biopsy proven LN who was given either oral or intravenous CYC. The male: female ratio was 4:37; with a mean age of 31.7 +/- 9.8 years at presentation. 36 patients (87.8%) had LN class IV and only five patients (12.2%) with LN class III. The mean serum creatinine at presentation was 87.4 +/- 37.2 micromol/L with mean follow-up of 84 +/- 78 months. A total of 30 patients (73.2%) completed 12 courses of IV CYC and one patient (2.4%) completed three months of oral CYC. 71.0% (n = 22) had complete response (CR), 25.8% (n = 8) had partial response and 3.2% (n = 1) had no response (NR). Of the remaining 11 patients, two patients (4.9%) died during the treatment, three patients (7.3%) defaulted treatment and five patients (12.2%) are still receiving ongoing treatment. Presence of hypertension (p < 0.003) and evidence of chronicity on renal biopsy (p < 0.016) were significantly correlated with the progressive deterioration of renal function in our population. In conclusion, hypertension and evidence of chronicity on renal biopsy, proved to be risk factors for progressive renal impairment in our study population. The achieved global outcome can be considered good.
    Study site: Hospital Ipoh, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
    Matched MeSH terms: Lupus Nephritis/therapy
  4. Deng D, Zhang P, Guo Y, Lim TO
    Ann Rheum Dis, 2017 Aug;76(8):1436-1439.
    PMID: 28478399 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211073
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUC-MSC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). Previous reports showed hUC-MSC could have dramatic treatment effect.

    METHODS: Eighteen patients with WHO class III or IV LN were randomly assigned to hUC-MSC (dose 2×108 cells) or placebo. All patients received standard immunosuppressive treatment, which consisted of intravenous methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, followed by maintenance oral prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil.

    RESULTS: Remission occurred in 9 of 12 patients (75%) in the hUC-MSC group and 5 of 6 patients (83%) in the placebo group. Remission was defined as stabilisation or improvement in renal function, reduction in urinary red cells and protein. A similar proportion of patients on hUC-MSC and placebo achieved complete remission. Improvements in serum albumin, complement, renal function, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group scores were similar in both groups. One patient on placebo had a stroke and another had ascites. One patient on hUC-MSC had leucopenia, pneumonia and subcutaneous abscess and another died of severe pneumonia. The trial was abandoned after 18 patients were enrolled when it had become obvious it would not demonstrate a positive treatment effect.

    CONCLUSION: hUC-MSC has no apparent additional effect over and above standard immunosuppression.

    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01539902; Results.
    Matched MeSH terms: Lupus Nephritis/therapy*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links