Displaying all 12 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Yew KL
    Med J Malaysia, 2012 Feb;67(1):136.
    PMID: 22582571
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/adverse effects*
  2. Sacco A, Morici N, Belli O, Bossi I, Mafrici A, Klugmann S
    Med J Malaysia, 2011 Dec;66(5):520-1.
    PMID: 22390119
    We present a case of "inverted Tako-Tsubo" syndrome in a woman sedated with meperidine before undergoing a colonscopy. We discuss possible etiology of this ventricular dysfunction.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/adverse effects*
  3. Chiu CK, Ng TS, Wazir NN, Bhurhanudeen KA
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2015 Jan;21(1):63-7.
    PMID: 25779715 DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.27475
    A rare case of bilateral anterior hip dislocation reduced under sedation was reported in this study. A 47-year-old man was knocked down by a car and sustained bilateral anterior hip dislocation which was reduced successfully with sedation using titrated dose of intravenous Midazolam in combination with Pethidine. A modified Lefkowitz maneuver using the manipulator's thigh as a fulcrum was used. Patient started weight bearing in the second month after injury and was walking without any hip pain at the twenty-fourth month follow-up. Thirteen case reports describing bilateral anterior hip dislocations were found while reviewing the literature and it was noticed that only one author had reported the usage of intravenous sedation (Propofol) for the reduction procedure. However, no author reported the use of Lefkowitz maneuver for this purpose. Consequently, reduction of a bilateral anterior hip dislocation is possible with sedation using a modified Lefkowitz maneuver.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/administration & dosage*
  4. Vijayan R, Delilkan AE
    Med J Malaysia, 1994 Dec;49(4):385-400.
    PMID: 7545779
    An Acute Pain Service (APS) was started in University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur by the Department of Anaesthesiology in October 1992 for more effective control of postoperative pain. The main modalities of treatment included patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine or pethidine with PCA devises, epidural opiate analgesia (EOA) using tramadol or fentanyl/bupivacaine mixture and subcutaneous administration of morphine or pethidine. Five hundred and fifty-one patients were managed in the first year, with an overall patient satisfaction score of 83%. The majority (98.5%) of them were after abdominal or major orthopaedic surgery. Eighty per cent of patients scored < 3 on the verbal numeric pain scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain, on the first postoperative day. Nausea and vomiting was an unpleasant side effect in 20% of patients.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/therapeutic use
  5. Menon R
    Med J Malaya, 1970 Sep;25(1):17-20.
    PMID: 4249487
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine*
  6. Gong NC, Rogers KJ
    Med J Malaysia, 1973 Jun;27(4):280-3.
    PMID: 4270786
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/adverse effects*
  7. Ramanathan R
    Med J Malaysia, 1998 Sep;53 Suppl A:99-101.
    PMID: 10968190
    We studied 95 patients who underwent knee Arthroscopy under local anaesthesia between JANUARY 1995 till 1997. Materials used were 1% Xylocaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine of 20 mls each combined with midazolam 2 mg and IV pethidine 30 mgm for sedation. The patients were attached to monitors (pulse Oxymeter, ECG and BP and pulse recorders) and blood less field was created using a tornquet. The procedures lasted about 45 minutes. 90 out of 95 patients completed the procedures successfully without any complications. 2 developed respiratory embarrassments and were intubated and ventilated. 3 procedures abandoned and converted to general anaesthesia. The range of procedures done include meniscectomy, meniscal repair, synovial biopsy, debridement for osteoarthrosis, shaving of osteophytes, drilling of cartilage and bones and removal of loose bodies. This study is to show that knee arthroscopy under LA is a safe alternative in hospitals where GA time is limited.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/adverse effects; Meperidine/therapeutic use
  8. Zin CS
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2020 Nov;12(Suppl 2):S846-S851.
    PMID: 33828388 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_252_19
    Background: It was reported that opioid consumption in developing countries was stagnated or decreased, but precise data on the consumption are unclear. This study examined the trends and patterns of opioid consumption in Malaysia and other four Southeast Asian countries.

    Materials and Methods: Data of five strong opioids consumption (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, pethidine, and methadone) between 2005 and 2014 from Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam were extracted from the Pain and Policy Studies Group. Defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) was used for calculating the annual amount of opioid use.

    Results: The total consumption of five strong opioids was increased in all five Southeast Asian countries during a 10-year study period. Malaysia was recorded with the largest increase of the opioid consumption (993.18%), followed by Indonesia (530.34%), Vietnam (170.17%), Singapore (116.16%), and Thailand (104.66%). Malaysia also had the highest total strong opioid consumption (11.2 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day), primarily for methadone. Among the opioids used for pain management, fentanyl was primarily used in Malaysia and Singapore but the greatest increase in these two countries was for oxycodone. Fentanyl was also primarily used in Indonesia while morphine was predominantly used in Thailand and Vietnam.

    Conclusion: Growing trends of strong opioids consumption in all five Southeast Asian countries demonstrated in this study may indicate improved access to opioid analgesics in these countries. Given the increasing trends, it is important to ensure that the utilization of opioids is according to the guideline to prevent the negative consequences of opioids particularly when used in chronic non-cancer pain.

    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine
  9. Marzida, M.
    JUMMEC, 2009;12(2):63-69.
    MyJurnal
    It is important to provide effective postoperative analgesia following a Caesarean section because mothers wish to be pain-free, mobile and alert while caring for their babies. The role of regular oral diclofenac as postoperative analgesia was evaluated in a randomized controlled study and it was compared to the established method of parenteral pethidine. Forty healthy women scheduled for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 2-2.5 mg of heavy bupivacaine 0.5% were randomized to receive either 75 mg of oral diclofenac twice daily or 1 mg/kg of subcutaneous pethidine every 8 hourly. Efficacy of pain relief (visual analogue score), patients' satisfaction and side effects such as sedation, nausea and vomiting were recorded for three days. The demographic variables were similar in both groups. Pain relief was adequate and comparable in both groups with similar mean visual analogue score during the second and third day of the study period. However, on the first postoperative day, 60% of the diclofenac group population required rescuemedication consisting of subcutaneous pethidine in order to achieve the same pain scores as those in the pethidine group who did not require any rescue medications. Women who received oral diclofenac reported lower sedation and higher overall satisfaction. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups. This concluded that although oral diclofenac 75mg twice daily may not be superior to the traditional method of subcutaneous pethidine for pain relief following caesarean section, it can still be used alone as an alternative, as it has other benefits of a non-opioid analgesia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine
  10. Rhendra Hardy MZ, Zayuah MS, Baharudin A, Wan Aasim WA, Shamsul KH, Hashimah I, et al.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2010 Apr;74(4):374-7.
    PMID: 20129679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.01.005
    Tonsillectomy is frequently associated with postoperative pain of considerable duration, which is usually accompanied by the substantial consumption of both opioid and non-opioid analgesic such as NSAIDs and local anaesthetics.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/therapeutic use
  11. Ma WT, Mahadeva S, Quek KF, Goh KL
    Med J Malaysia, 2007 Oct;62(4):313-8.
    PMID: 18551936 MyJurnal
    Tolerance to colonoscopy varies between populations and data from the South East Asian region is lacking. We aimed to determine tolerance and safety with to colonoscopy; conscious sedation and identify risk factors for complications in Malaysian adults. Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled prospectively. A combination of pethidine and midazolam were used and tolerance to colonoscopy assessed three hours post-procedure using a validated scale. All patients were monitored for cardiorespiratory depression and risk factors for complications were identified. Two hundred and eight patients (mean age 57.2 +/- 14.8 years, 48% female) were enrolled. The population ethnicity consisted of 45 (21.63%) Malays, 101 (48.56%) Chinese and 56 (26.92%) Indians. Conscious sedation was achieved with 5.0 +/- 1.1 mg of midazolam and 43.3 +/- 14.0 mg of pethidine. Thirty (14.4%) patients tolerated the procedure poorly and independent predictors included female gender (OR 2.93, 95% CI = 1.22 to 7.01) and a prolonged duration of procedure (OR 2.85, 95% CI = 1.08 to 7.48). Hypotension occurred in 13 (6.25%) patients, with age > 65 years as the only risk factor (OR 13.17, 95% CI = 1.28 to 137.92). A prolonged duration was the main cause of hypoxia (OR 5.49, 95% CI = 1.54 to 19.49), which occurred in 6 (2.88%) patients. No major complications occurred during the study period. The current practice of conscious sedation is safe and tolerated well by most adults in our population. However, poor tolerance in a notable minority may have significant clinical implications.

    Study site: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC)
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/adverse effects*
  12. Wan Hazmy CH, Maizuliana SH, Mastura MT, Norazlina M
    Med J Malaysia, 2006 Feb;61 Suppl A:45-9.
    PMID: 17042229
    Adequate pain relief is a requisite for a successful closed manipulative reduction (CMR) of fractures and dislocations. This prospective study was undertaken to assess the mode and adequacy of pain relief given to patients undergoing such procedures at Seremban Hospital from the 1st April to the 31st May 2001. All patients with fractures and dislocations scheduled to undergo CMR were included in this study. The type of sedative agents and analgesia administered were recorded. Demographic data and the type of fracture or dislocation of the selected patients were documented. A visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain perception was given to both to the patients and the medical personnel who performed the procedure. All data were collected manually before entered into computerized database for analysis. Of 72 patients included in this study, 47% were Malay, 26% Indian, 21% Chinese and 6% others. There was male predominance and the patients' age ranged between 9 to 79 years (average 27.4 years). Upper limb injuries (79%) were mainly fractures of the radius and ulna (29%) and isolated fracture radius (21%). For the lower limb injuries (21%), combined tibia and fibula fractures constituted 10% of the total cases followed by isolated tibia fractures (10%) and hip dislocation (1%). The most common pain relieving agents given during the CMR were intravenous pethidine alone (43%) followed by combination of intravenous pethidine and valium (36%), intramuscular pethidine (17%) and intramuscular tramal (4%). The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain perception revealed that 61% of the patients had moderate pain while 21% had severe pain during the course of the procedures. Suboptimal pain relief administered during CMR should prompt positive actions to ensure that the patient is not subjected to undue pain just for the sake of an acceptable fracture reduction.
    Matched MeSH terms: Meperidine/therapeutic use
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links