OBJECTIVE: The systematic review is aimed at evaluating the value of PRF in different areas of surgery.
DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of articles sourced from MEDLINE-pubmed (2008-2017(July)) was done. Additional articles were searched through GOOGLE SCHOLAR and SCIENCE DIRECT. Search terms such as Platelet rich fibrin; Platelet rich fibrin, surgery; Platelet concentrate; second generation concentrate; Applications of PRF in surgery were used.
STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews, Randomized control trials, Pilot studies and Case reports were included. Non English articles, in-vitro and animal studies were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION: Independent sourcing of articles by 3 authors using a set of predefined criteria.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Out of the 25 articles covering various surgical procedures that met the inclusion criteria, positive outcomes were noted in most. Although categorization into one specific type of study was not done, the overall success rate with PRF usage was 78%.No differences between test and control groups were observed in 2 studies and 3 studies showed no significant improvements with the usage of PRF.
LIMITATIONS: The systematic review did not categorize the study designs while evaluating success rates which might be considered as a shortcoming as case reports were also included.
CONCLUSIONS: The future propositions are vast and point towards innovative applications of this bio-material possibly in transplant and burn cases if a method of obtaining large amounts can be devised. However since we rely on evidence-based results, further long term studies are needed in distinct areas of applications to decisively prove its effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical practices of spine surgeons within the Asia Pacific region.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: COVID-19 pandemic had changed spine surgeons' clinical practices and their concerns toward personal and family risk of infection.
METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was carried out from May 4, 2020 to June 4, 2020. The questionnaire was administered using REDCAP. The online questionnaire includes four sections. First section includes surgeon's demographics, background, type of clinical practice, and status of pandemic in their country. Second section includes volume and the type of spine surgery practice before the COVID pandemic. Third section includes changes of clinical practice during the pandemic and the last section was regarding their concern on COVID transmission.
RESULTS: Total of 222 respondents from 19 countries completed the questionnaire. During the pandemic, 92.3% of the respondents felt their clinical practice was affected. 58.5% respondents reported reduced outpatient clinic hours and 74.6% respondents reported reduced operation theatre hours due to the enforcement by the hospital administration. The mean reduction of clinic volume for all countries was 48.1%. There was a significant reduction in the number of surgeries performed in Japan, Malaysia, India, Philippines, and South Korea. This was due to reduced patient load. More than 60% of respondents were worried being infected by COVID-19 virus and >68% were worried of transmission to their family members.
CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the clinical and surgical practice of spine surgeons in the Asia Pacific region. Clinics were closed or the practice hours reduced. Similarly, surgical theaters were closed, reduced, or limited to semi-emergency and emergency surgeries. Spine surgeons were moderately concerned of contracting COVID-19 during their clinical practice but were extremely concerned to transmit this disease to their family members.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study on babies with CTEV treated in University Malaya Medical Centre from 2013 to 2017. The 54 babies (35 boys and 19 girls) were divided into two cohorts, Group 1 that had treatment before the age of one month, and Group 2 that had treatment after one month old. The number of cast changes, rate of full correction, and rate of relapse after treatment were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Of the 54 babies, with 77 CTEV treated during the period, our outcome showed that the mean number of cast change was 5.9 for Group 1 and 5.7 for Group 2. The difference was not statistically significant. All the affected feet (100%) achieved full correction. One foot in the Group 1 relapsed, while three feet in Group 2 relapsed, but the difference was also not statistically significant. All of the relapsed feet were successfully treated with repeated Ponseti method.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating CTEV using Ponseti method starting after one month was not associated with more casting change of higher rate of relapse.