DESIGN: This multicenter, parallel group, randomized controlled trial involved 363 prevalent CAPD patients from 8 centers. The primary endpoint was peritonitis rate; secondary endpoints were technique failure and technical problems encountered. The duration of the evaluation was 1 year.
RESULTS: The risk of peritonitis on Carex varied between the centers. We found a significant treatment-center interaction effect (likelihood ratio test: p = 0.03). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of peritonitis on Carex as compared with Ultra ranged from 0.4 to 7.2. In two centers, Carex was inferior to Ultra with regard to peritonitis; but, in five centers, the results were inconclusive. Equivalence was not demonstrated in any center. The overall rate of peritonitis in the Carex group was twice that in the Ultra group [IRR: 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51 to 3.14]. Technique failure and technical problems were more common with the Carex system. Technique failure rate at 1 year was 44% in the Carex group and 22% in the Ultra group.
CONCLUSIONS: Equivalence between the Carex disconnect system and the Ultra disconnect system could not be demonstrated. The risk of peritonitis on Carex varied significantly between centers.
PURPOSE: We set out to describe the reproductive health issues in women being treated with either hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult female patients on chronic dialysis in Hospital Seremban from January 1991 to December 2001 were included in our study. Patients (or their spouses or children) were interviewed regarding the menstrual status of the patient, gynecologic screening tests administered to the patient, and the patient's use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
RESULTS: We recruited 137 women into the study. Of those women, 52.6% were on HD; the rest were on CAPD. Mean age at diagnosis of ESRD was 46.5 +/- 14.1 years (range: 14 - 82 years), and mean duration on dialysis was 33.3 months (range: 2 months - 18 years). Responses about menstrual status were obtained for 118 patients. Of those 118 patients, 55 (46.6%) were postmenopausal at dialysis initiation. Average age at menopause had been 48.5 +/- 4.9 years. Another 19 patients (16.1%) had still been menstruating at dialysis initiation, but subsequently entered menopause. Their average age at menopause had been 45.1 +/- 10.3 years. The remaining 44 patients (37.3%) were still menstruating at an average age of 35.7 years (range: 15 - 49 years). Only 3 of 73 responders were on HRT; 63% had undergone a Pap smear; and 54% had had a breast examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD tend to experience premature menopause. Not all dialysis patients are amenorrheic. Despite frequent contact between dialysis patients and hospital staff, gynecologic screening and use of HRT in those patients are still very low.