Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of English and Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Quest International University, 30250, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Quest International University, 30250, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
  • 3 Centre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Pre-Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 43000, Kajang, Malaysia
  • 5 Jeffrey Sachs Center On Sustainable Development, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of History, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 8 Emergency Medicine Department, Sunway Medical Centre, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. seowvk@sunway.com.my
  • 9 Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. peiboono@sunway.edu.my
BMC Public Health, 2022 02 14;22(1):296.
PMID: 35164734 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12632-z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global health emergency and lock-down measures to curb the uncontrolled transmission chain. Vaccination is an effective measure against COVID-19 infections. In Malaysia amidst the national immunisation programme (NIP) which started in February 2021, there were rising concerns regarding the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and therefore, vaccine uptake among Malaysians. Although there are many quantitative studies on COVID-19 vaccination, the subjective experience of individuals was understudied. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of Malaysians regarding vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and facilitating factors that could enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.

METHODS: This qualitative study employed the hermeneutic phenomenological study design. Purposive sampling strategies were used to recruit Malaysians that had direct experiences with friends, family members and their community who were hesitating or refusing to accept the COVID-19 vaccines. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the expert knowledge of the investigators and existing literature on the topic. A series of focus group interviews (FGIs) was conducted online facilitated by a multidisciplinary team of experts. The group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed.

RESULTS: Fifty-nine participants took part in seven FGIs. We found that "incongruence" was the overall thematic meaning that connected all the 3 main themes. These themes comprise firstly, the incongruence between the aims and implementation of the National Immunization Program which highlighted the gap between realities and needs on the ground. Secondly, the incongruence between Trust and Mistrust revealed a trust deficit in the government, COVID-19 news, and younger people's preference to follow the examples of local vaccination "heroes". Thirdly, the incongruence in communication showed the populace's mixed views regarding official media and local social media.

CONCLUSIONS: This study provided rich details on the complex picture of the COVID-19 immunization program in Malaysia and its impact on vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The inter-related and incongruent factors explained the operational difficulty and complexity of the NIP and the design of an effective health communication campaign. Identified gaps such as logistical implementation and communication strategies should be noted by policymakers in implementing mitigation plans.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.