Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
  • 2 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
  • 3 Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Science, Imperial College London, Sunningdale SL5 7PY, United Kingdom
  • 4 School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 4LB, United Kingdom
  • 5 School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
  • 6 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom
  • 7 Forest Research Centre, Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, Sabah 90175, Malaysia
  • 8 Instituto de Ciencias de la Naturaleza, Territorio y Energías Renovables, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru, Lima 15088, Perú
  • 9 Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco 08000, Perú
  • 10 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom
  • 11 South East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership, Danum Valley Field Centre, Lahad Datu, Sabah 91112, Malaysia
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2023 Jan 17;120(3):e2214462120.
PMID: 36623189 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214462120

Abstract

Logged and structurally degraded tropical forests are fast becoming one of the most prevalent land-use types throughout the tropics and are routinely assumed to be a net carbon sink because they experience rapid rates of tree regrowth. Yet this assumption is based on forest biomass inventories that record carbon stock recovery but fail to account for the simultaneous losses of carbon from soil and necromass. Here, we used forest plots and an eddy covariance tower to quantify and partition net ecosystem CO2 exchange in Malaysian Borneo, a region that is a hot spot for deforestation and forest degradation. Our data represent the complete carbon budget for tropical forests measured throughout a logging event and subsequent recovery and found that they constitute a substantial and persistent net carbon source. Consistent with existing literature, our study showed a significantly greater woody biomass gain across moderately and heavily logged forests compared with unlogged forests, but this was counteracted by much larger carbon losses from soil organic matter and deadwood in logged forests. We estimate an average carbon source of 1.75 ± 0.94 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 within moderately logged plots and 5.23 ± 1.23 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 in unsustainably logged and severely degraded plots, with emissions continuing at these rates for at least one-decade post-logging. Our data directly contradict the default assumption that recovering logged and degraded tropical forests are net carbon sinks, implying the amount of carbon being sequestered across the world's tropical forests may be considerably lower than currently estimated.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.