Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Botany, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Government College Women University, Sialkot. Pakistan
  • 2 Department of Botany, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Electronic address: noshinilyas@uaar.edu.pk
  • 3 Department of Botany, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • 4 Earth and Environment Department, Florida International University, USA
  • 5 Asian PGPR Society for Sustainable Agriculture, Auburn Ventures, Auburn, AL, 36830, USA
  • 6 Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 9004, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Department of Chemical Engineering, Khalifa University, 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Subtropical Water Environment and Marine Biological Resources Protection, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, Malaysia, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; Department of Sustainable Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, India
  • 8 Government College Women University, Sialkot. Pakistan
Chemosphere, 2023 May;324:138311.
PMID: 36878368 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138311

Abstract

A novel kinetic model has been developed to explain the degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Microbiome engineered biochar amendment may result in a synergistic impact on degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs). Therefore, the present study analyzed the potential of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria A designated as Aeromonas hydrophila YL17 and B as Shewanella putrefaciens Pdp11 morphological characterized as rod shaped, anaerobic and gram-negative immobilized on biochar, and the degradation efficiency was measured by gravimetric analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Whole genome sequencing of both strains revealed the existence of genes responsible for hydrocarbon degradation. In 60 days remediation setup, the treatment consisting of immobilization of both strains on biochar proved more efficient with less half-life and better biodegradation potentials compared to biochar without strains for decreasing the content of TPHs and n-alkanes (C12-C18). Enzymatic content and microbiological respiration showed that biochar acted as a soil fertilizer and carbon reservoir and enhanced microbial activities. The removal efficiency of hydrocarbons was found to be a maximum of 67% in soil samples treated with biochar immobilized with both strains (A + B), followed by biochar immobilized with strain B 34%, biochar immobilized with strain A 29% and with biochar 24%, respectively. A 39%, 36%, and 41% increase was observed in fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis, polyphenol oxidase and dehydrogenase activities in immobilized biochar with both strains as compared to control and individual treatment of biochar and strains. An increase of 35% was observed in the respiration rate with the immobilization of both strains on biochar. While a maximum colony forming unit (CFU/g) was found 9.25 with immobilization of both strains on biochar at 40 days of remediation. The degradation efficiency was due to synergistic effect of both biochar and bacteria based amendment on the soil enzymatic activity and microbial respiration.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.