Affiliations 

  • 1 Monash Health School of Clinical Sciences and
  • 2 Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 3 College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 5 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, IJN-UTM Cardiovascular Engineering Center, National Heart Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 7 Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • 8 Sydney Medical School-Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 9 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 10 Adult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; and
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2023 Apr 01;207(7):876-886.
PMID: 36215171 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202206-1208OC

Abstract

Rationale: The SPICE III (Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation) trial reported significant heterogeneity in mortality with dexmedetomidine treatment. Supplemental propofol was commonly used to achieve desirable sedation. Objectives: To quantify the association of different infusion rates of dexmedetomidine and propofol, given in combination, with mortality and to determine if this is modified by age. Methods: We included 1,177 patients randomized in SPICE III to receive dexmedetomidine and given supplemental propofol, stratified by age (>65 or ⩽65 yr). We used double stratification analysis to produce quartiles of steady infusion rates of dexmedetomidine while escalating propofol dose and vice versa. We used Cox proportional hazard and multivariable regression adjusted for relevant clinical variable to evaluate the association of sedative dose with 90-day mortality. Measurements and Main Results: Younger patients (598 of 1,177 [50.8%]) received significantly higher doses of both sedatives compared with older patients to achieve comparable sedation depth. On double stratification analysis, escalating infusion rates of propofol to 1.27 mg/kg/h at a steady dexmedetomidine infusion rate (0.54 μg/kg/h) was associated with reduced adjusted mortality in younger but not older patients. This was consistent with multivariable regression modeling (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.78; P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications