Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia
Microsc Res Tech, 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761.
PMID: 37078493 DOI: 10.1002/jemt.24323

Abstract

To assess the interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of three different bioceramic-based sealers (CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG) compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) in oval root canals. Fourty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar with oval canal were prepared and randomly allocated according to the obturation into; CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG and AH Plus. The roots were sectioned at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. The sealer adaptation and the penetration depth were evaluated under confocal laser scanning microscope. One-way ANOVA and Repeated measure ANOVA were used to statistically analyze the data. Nishika Canal Sealer BG showed significantly higher sealer adaptation than EndoSeal MTA (P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.