Affiliations 

  • 1 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. draznida@ppukm.ukm.edu.my
Med J Malaysia, 2023 May;78(3):301-307.
PMID: 37271839

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Depression in the elderly constitutes 7.3% of the total Malaysian national prevalence of depression. However, depression is commonly underdiagnosed by primary care physicians, which may impact coexisting comorbid conditions and general well-being. As depression in the elderly increases with age, its prevalence is expected to become even more significant due to the increased life expectancy and isolation during the pandemic. This study aims to determine the perceptions, views and barriers encountered among primary care physicians on screening for depression among the elderly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study involved five public healthcare clinics in the Kuching district with indepth interviews (IDI) conducted on 14 primary care doctors (PCDs). Semi-structured interviews and in-depth discussions were conducted via videoconferencing. One representative was selected from each clinic at initiation, followed by snowball method for subsequent subject selection until saturation of themes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and analysis based on framework analysis principles via NVivo software. Themes were analysed deductively according to study objectives and evidence from literature.

RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the IDI: (1) The perception of depression in elderly patients, (2) The perceived barriers to screening, and (3) The screening processes. Majority of the PCDs perceived depression as part of ageing process. Time constraints, lack of privacy in consultation rooms, dominant caregivers and failure to recognise recurrent somatic symptoms as part of depression influenced PCDs decision to screen. Screening was technically challenging for PCDs to use the DASS-21, which was not socio-culturally validated for local native population. Only 21.4% of respondents (3/14) reported screening at least three out 10 elderly patients seen over 1- month period. During the covid pandemic, due to the same human resource support and practices, most participants thought their screening for depression in elderlies had not changed.

CONCLUSION: Awareness of depression among PCDs needs to be re-enforced via continuous medical education programs to use appropriate screening tools, address infrastructure related barriers to optimise screening practices. The use of appropriate locally validated and socio-culturally adapted tool is vital to correctly interpret the screening test for patients.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.