Affiliations 

  • 1 Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, 4523 Clayton Ave., CB 8051, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States of America. Electronic address: dharushana@gmail.com
  • 2 Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, United States of America
  • 3 Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, United States of America; APT Foundation, New Haven, CT, United States of America
  • 4 Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America
  • 5 Yale School of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, New Haven, CT, United States of America
  • 6 Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, United States of America; APT Foundation, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America; University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
J Subst Use Addict Treat, 2023 Nov;154:209138.
PMID: 37544510 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209138

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic continues to be a public health crisis that has worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are the most effective way to reduce complications from opioid use disorder (OUD), but uptake is limited by both structural and individual factors. To inform strategies addressing individual factors, we evaluated patients' preferences and trade-offs in treatment decisions using conjoint analysis.

METHOD: We developed a conjoint analysis survey evaluating patients' preferences for FDA-approved MOUDs. We recruited patients with OUD presenting to initiate treatment. This survey included five attributes: induction, location and route of administration, impact on mortality, side effects, and withdrawal symptoms with cessation. Participants performed 12 choice sets, each with two hypothetical profiles and a "none" option. We used Hierarchical Bayes to identify relative importance of each attribute and part-worth utility scores of levels, which we compared using chi-squared analysis. We used the STROBE checklist to guide our reporting of this cross-sectional observational study.

RESULTS: Five-hundred and thirty participants completed the study. Location with route of administration was the most important attribute. Symptom relief during induction and withdrawal was a second priority. Mortality followed by side effects had lowest relative importance. Attribute levels with highest part-worth utilities showed patients preferred monthly pick-up from a pharmacy rather than daily supervised dosing; and oral medications more than injection/implants, despite the latter's infrequency.

CONCLUSION: We measured treatment preferences among patients seeking to initiate OUD treatment to inform strategies to scale MOUD treatment uptake. Patients prioritize the route of administration in treatment preference-less frequent pick up, but also injections and implants were less preferred despite their convenience. Second, patients prioritize symptom relief during the induction and withdrawal procedures of medication. These transition periods influence the sustainability of treatment. Although health professionals prioritize mortality, it did not drive decision-making for patients. To our knowledge, this is the largest study on patients' preferences for MOUD among treatment-seeking people with OUD to date. Future analysis will evaluate patient preference heterogeneity to further target program planning, counseling, and decision aid development.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.