Affiliations 

  • 1 Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BristolBS8 1TH, England
  • 2 School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 3 Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
  • 4 School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
  • 5 Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 National Maternal and Child Health Centre, Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  • 7 National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 8 National Nutrition Centre, Ministry of Health, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • 9 Nutrition Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 10 National Nutrition Council, Taguig City, Philippines
  • 11 Office of the Prime Minister, Díli, Timor-Leste
  • 12 Bureau of Nutrition, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
  • 13 National Institute of Nutrition, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Bull World Health Organ, 2023 Nov 01;101(11):690-706F.
PMID: 37961057 DOI: 10.2471/BLT.23.289973

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyse ongoing nutrition-related surveillance programmes led and/or funded by national authorities in countries in South-East Asian and Western Pacific Regions.

METHODS: We systematically searched for publications in PubMed® and Scopus, manually searched the grey literature and consulted with national health and nutrition officials, with no restrictions on publication type or language. We included low- and middle-income countries in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and China. We analysed the included programmes by adapting the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's public health surveillance evaluation framework.

FINDINGS: We identified 82 surveillance programmes in 18 countries that repeatedly collect, analyse and disseminate data on nutrition and/or related indicators. Seventeen countries implemented a national periodic survey that exclusively collects nutrition-outcome indicators, often alongside internationally linked survey programmes. Coverage of different subpopulations and monitoring frequency vary substantially across countries. We found limited integration of food environment and wider food system indicators in these programmes, and no programmes specifically monitor nutrition-sensitive data across the food system. There is also limited nutrition-related surveillance of people living in urban deprived areas. Most surveillance programmes are digitized, use measures to ensure high data quality and report evidence of flexibility; however, many are inconsistently implemented and rely on external agencies' financial support.

CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve the time efficiency, scope and stability of national nutrition surveillance, and integration with other sectoral data, should be encouraged and supported to allow systemic monitoring and evaluation of malnutrition interventions in these countries.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications