Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya (UM), 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: kenneth.boo@um.edu.my
  • 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya (UM), 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; National Water and Energy Center, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address: elshafie@um.edu.my
  • 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya (UM), 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: faridahothman@um.edu.my
  • 4 Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, 15551 Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address: msherif@uaeu.ac.ae
  • 5 School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, 47500, Malaysia
Sci Total Environ, 2024 Feb 20;912:168760.
PMID: 38013106 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168760

Abstract

A modeling framework utilizing the coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system (CANFIS) has been developed for multi-lead time groundwater level (GWL) forecasting in four different wells located in Texas and Florida, USA. Various model input combinations, including GWL, precipitation, temperature, and surface water level variables, have been derived based on proposed correlation analysis using singular spectrum analysis (SSA) remainders. The models have been trained on data subsets of varying lengths to identify the optimal training data duration. Additionally, we have introduced the bagging ensemble learning method to enhance the performance of the CANFIS model. As part of a comprehensive model evaluation process, the best-performing CANFIS model for each forecasting scenario has undergone uncertainty analysis using bootstrap sampling. Our results reveal that the CANFIS model performs satisfactorily for daily forecasting but leaves room for improvement in monthly forecasting, particularly for two-month and three-month ahead forecasts. Moreover, we have identified several optimal input combinations, highlighting the significance of the temperature variable in monthly forecasting. Furthermore, our findings indicate that additional training data does not necessarily lead to improved performance. The ensemble CANFIS model has demonstrated significant performance enhancement, particularly for monthly forecasting. Finally, the CANFIS model uncertainty analysis has shown satisfactory results for daily forecasting scenarios, while monthly forecasting models exhibit higher uncertainties, particularly during periods with distinctly different GWL fluctuation patterns.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.