Affiliations 

  • 1 Shandong Engineering Research Center of Novel Pharmaceutical Excipients, Sustained and Controlled Release Preparations, College of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
  • 2 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Takzim 81310, Malaysia
  • 3 Hebei Key Laboratory of Heterocyclic Compounds, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials, Handan University, Handan, Hebei 056005, China
  • 4 College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
  • 5 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
  • 6 College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, 19# Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing 100875, China
J Chem Inf Model, 2024 Feb 12;64(3):785-798.
PMID: 38262973 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01584

Abstract

The allosteric modulation of the homodimeric H10-03-6 protein to glycan ligands L1 and L2, and the STAB19 protein to glycan ligands L3 and L4, respectively, has been studied by molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. The results revealed that the STAB19 protein has a significantly higher affinity for L3 (-11.38 ± 2.32 kcal/mol) than that for L4 (-5.51 ± 1.92 kcal/mol). However, the combination of the H10-03-6 protein with glycan L2 (1.23 ± 6.19 kcal/mol) is energetically unfavorable compared with that of L1 (-13.96 ± 0.35 kcal/mol). Further, the binding of glycan ligands L3 and L4 to STAB19 would result in the significant closure of the two CH2 domains of the STAB19 conformation with the decrease of the centroid distances between the two CH2 domains compared with the H10-03-6/L1/L2 complex. The CH2 domain closure of STAB19 relates directly to the formation of new hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions between the residues Ser239, Val240, Asp265, Glu293, Asn297, Thr299, Ser337, Asp376, Thr393, Pro395, and Pro396 in STAB19 and glycan ligands L3 and L4, which suggests that these key residues would contribute to the specific regulation of STAB19 to L3 and L4. In addition, the distance analysis revealed that the EF loop in the H10-03-6/L1/L2 model presents a high flexibility and partial disorder compared with the stabilized STAB19/L3/L4 complex. These results will be helpful in understanding the specific regulation through the asymmetric structural characteristics in the CH2 and CH3 domains of the H10-03-6 and STAB19 proteins.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications