Affiliations 

  • 1 Laboratory of Theriology, Institute of Zoology, 050060, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • 2 Zoological Museum, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156‑83111, Iran. davoudfadakar@gmail.com
  • 4 School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 020000, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 6 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Sci Rep, 2024 Mar 02;14(1):5186.
PMID: 38431728 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55807-x

Abstract

The Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) exhibits geographic variability and phylogenetic intraspecific relationships. Previous morphological studies have suggested the existence of multiple lynx subspecies, but recent genetic research has questioned this classification, particularly in Central Asia. In this study, we aimed to analyse the geographic and genetic variation in Central Asian lynx populations, particularly the Turkestan lynx and Altai lynx populations, using morphometric data and mtDNA sequences to contribute to their taxonomic classification. The comparative analysis of morphometric data revealed limited clinal variability between lynx samples from the Altai and Tien Shan regions. By examining mtDNA fragments (control region and cytochrome b) obtained from Kazakhstani lynx populations, two subspecies were identified: L. l. isabellinus (represented by a unique haplotype of the South clade, H46) and L. l. wrangeli (represented by haplotypes H36, H45, and H47 of the East clade). L. l. isabellinus was recognized only in Tien Shan Mountain, while Altai lynx was likely identical to L. l. wrangeli and found in northern Kazakhstan, Altai Mountain, Saur and Tarbagatai Mountains, and Tien Shan Mountain. The morphological and mtDNA evidence presented in this study, although limited in sample size and number of genetic markers, renders the differentiation of the two subspecies challenging. Further sampling and compilation of whole-genome sequencing data are necessary to confirm whether the proposed subspecies warrant taxonomic standing.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.