Affiliations 

  • 1 National Taiwan University, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
  • 2 Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Forest Protection Division, Taipei 100051, Taiwan; abiboda@gmail.com
  • 3 National Taiwan University, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Taipei 106319, Taiwan; vi072160532@gmail.com
  • 4 National Taiwan University, Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Taipei 106319, Taiwan; f08633003@g.ntu.edu.tw
  • 5 National Taiwan University, Master Program for Plant Medicine, Taipei 106319, Taiwan; tingzhiliao1209@gmail.com
  • 6 Academia Sinica, Biodiversity Research Center, Taipei 115201, Taiwan; hhl97@gate.sinica.edu.tw
  • 7 Academia Sinica, Biodiversity Research Center, Taipei 115201, Taiwan; ijtsai@gate.sinica.edu.tw
  • 8 Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Forest Protection Division, Taipei 100051, Taiwan; ttchang2323@gmail.com
  • 9 Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Forest Protection Division, Taipei 100051, Taiwan; mlw@tfri.gov.tw
  • 10 Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Plant Pathology, Taichung 413008, Taiwan; TsaiJN@tari.gov.tw
  • 11 USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID 83843, United States; ned.klopfenstein@usda.gov
  • 12 USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States; meesook.kim@usda.gov
  • 13 Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural Biology, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States; Jane.Stewart@colostate.edu
  • 14 American Samoa Community College, Division of Agriculture, Community, and Natural Resources, Western Dist. 96799, American Samoa; atibalentja@gmail.com
  • 15 1961 Westwood Pl., Pomona, CA 91768, United States; fredbrooks1144@gmail.com
  • 16 USDA Forest Service Region 5, State, Private, and Tribal Forestry, Vallejo, CA 94592, United States; phil.cannon@usda.gov
  • 17 Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), Forest Health and Conservation Programme, Selangor 52109, Malaysia; mohdfarid@frim.gov.my
  • 18 Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba 305-8687, Japan; hattori@affrc.go.jp
  • 19 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, School of Life Sciences, Central Ave, Hong Kong; hskwan@eservices.cuhk.edu.hk
  • 20 Muni Arborist Limited, Lam Tsuen, Hong Kong; regent.lam@muniarborist.com
  • 21 Nihon University, College of Bioresource Sciences, Kanagawa 252-0880, Japan; yuota2317@gmail.com
  • 22 Forestry & Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba 305-8687, Japan; sahasi@affrc.go.jp
  • 23 University of Guam, Cooperative Extension and Outreach, Mangilao 96923, Guam; rlschlub@gmail.com
  • 24 Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane 4001, Australia; Louise.Shuey@daf.qld.gov.au
  • 25 Hong Kong Baptist University, Continuing and Professional Education Division, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong, China; alvintang@hkbu.edu.hk
  • 26 National Taiwan University, Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
Plant Dis, 2024 Jun 29.
PMID: 38944685 DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-01-24-0238-RE

Abstract

Brown root rot disease (BRRD) is a highly destructive tree disease. Early diagnosis of BRRD has been challenging because the first symptoms and signs are often observed after extensive tissue colonization. Existing molecular detection methods, all based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, were developed without testing against global Phellinus noxius isolates, other wood decay fungi, or host plant tissues. This study developed SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for P. noxius. The primer pair Pn_ITS_F/Pn_ITS_R targets the ITS, and the primer pair Pn_NLR_F/Pn_NLR_R targets a P. noxius-unique group of homologous genes identified through a comparative genomics analysis. The homologous genes belong to the nucleotide-binding-oligomerization-domain-like receptor (NLR) superfamily. The new primer pairs and a previous primer pair G1F/G1R were optimized for qPCR conditions and tested for specificity using 61 global P. noxius isolates, five other Phellinus species, and 22 non-Phellinus wood decay fungal species. While all three primer pairs could detect as little as 100 fg (about 2.99 copies) of P. noxius genomic DNA, G1F/G1R had the highest specificity and Pn_NLR_F/Pn_NLR_R had the highest efficiency. To avoid false positives, the cutoff Cq values were determined as 34 for G1F/G1R, 29 for Pn_ITS_F/Pn_ITS_R, and 32 for Pn_NLR_F/Pn_NLR_R. We further validated these qPCR assays using Ficus benjamina seedlings artificially inoculated with P. noxius, six tree species naturally infected by P. noxius, rhizosphere soil, and bulk soil. The newly developed qPCR assays provide sensitive detection and quantification of P. noxius, which is useful for long-term monitoring of BRRD status.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.