Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Immunology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan; Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. Electronic address: hit-ohto@fmu.ac.jp
  • 2 Department of Transfusion Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: bill.flegel@nih.gov
  • 3 Sanquin Blood Bank, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: p.vandermeer@sanquin.nl
  • 4 Outaouais Integrated Health and Social Services Centre, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: alain.ngoma@mail.mcgill.ca
  • 5 Department of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Immunology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan; Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
  • 6 Dibrugarh Cancer Centre, Assam Cancer Care Foundation, Dibrugarh, India. Electronic address: contact@drnchoudhury.com
  • 7 Department of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: tlegler@med.uni-goettingen.de
Transfus Apher Sci, 2025 Feb 11;64(2):104086.
PMID: 39970652 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2025.104086

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously, two international surveys have addressed the wider application of platelet collection by apheresis technology and practical issues of platelet transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to persons with leadership roles related to blood banking and transfusion medicine in their countries/areas/centers, to document the implementation of modern technologies for platelet manufacturing, preservation, and transfusion risk reduction.

RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaire finally came from 52 contributors in 40 countries/areas. Adult platelet doses ranged between 2.0×1011 and 4.0×1011 (median 2.5×1011). In approximately 10 % of centers, apheresis platelets comprised more than 90 % of the platelet inventory. More than 70 % of centers adopted universal or near universal leukocyte-reduction by filtration, apheresis, or both. Almost 20 % of centers irradiated all platelet products. Cold-stored platelets were rarely reported; only 3 centers produce such components for 1 % to 5 % of their supply. The use of platelet additive solution was reported by 18 responders (45 %), mainly in Europe, USA, and Australasia. Bacterial detection systems were reported by 18 responders from around the globe. One fatality was reported after transfusion of a platelet product contaminated with Bacillus cereus, whereas no sequelae were observed after transfusion of >350 platelet products contaminated by Cutibacteriae. Pathogen-reduction/pathogen-inactivation technology has been adopted in 15 centers, with little or no extended expiration period. Export of platelets across national borders was extremely rare.

CONCLUSION: With this addition to the literature on platelet transfusion, considerable heterogeneity in collection, processing, and transfusion can be seen across the globe, through which readers may adopt, and adapt, best practices for their unique local circumstances.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.