Affiliations 

  • 1 a Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies , University of Tasmania , Tasmania , Australia
  • 2 b School of Engineering and ICT , University of Tasmania , Tasmania , Australia
  • 3 c School of Biological Sciences , University of Tasmania , Tasmania , Australia
  • 4 e Centre for Policy Research and International Studies , Universiti Sains Malaysia , Penang , Malaysia
  • 5 g Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences , University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia
Biofouling, 2016 07;32(6):685-97.
PMID: 27244248 DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2016.1184255

Abstract

Biofouling in canals and pipelines used for hydroelectric power generation decreases the flow capacity of conduits. A pipeline rig was designed consisting of test sections of varying substrata (PVC, painted steel) and light levels (transparent, frosted, opaque). Stalk-forming diatoms were abundant in both the frosted and transparent PVC pipes but negligible in the painted steel and opaque PVC pipes. Fungi were slightly more abundant in the painted steel pipe but equally present in all the other pipes while bacterial diversity was similar in all pipes. Photosynthetically functional biofouling (mainly diatoms) was able to develop in near darkness. Different biological fouling compositions generated differing friction factors. The highest friction factor was observed in the transparent pipe (densest diatom fouling), the lowest peak friction for the opaque PVC pipe (lowest fouling biomass), and with the painted steel pipe (high fouling biomass, but composed of fungal and bacterial crusts) being intermediate between the opaque and frosted PVC pipes.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.