Suture Cruroplasty Versus Prosthetic Hiatal Herniorrhaphy for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Memon MA 1 , Memon B , Yunus RM , Khan S

Affiliations 

  • 1 *South East Queensland Surgery (SEQS) and Sunnybank Obesity Centre, Sunnybank, Queensland, Australia †Mayne Medical School, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia ‡Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia §Faculty of Health and Social Science, Bolton University, Bolton, Lancashire, UK ¶Institute of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ||School of Agricultural, Computing and Environmental Sciences, International Centre for Applied Climate Sciences and Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
Ann Surg, 2016 Feb;263(2):258-66.
PMID: 26445468 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001267

Abstract

The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate their strengths and flaws.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

MeSH terms
Similar publications