Meta-Analysis of Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) Versus Conservative Management for Gallstone Pancreatitis (GSP)

Burstow MJ 1 , Yunus RM , Hossain MB , Khan S , Memon B , Memon MA

Affiliations 

  • 1 *Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital †School of Agricultural, Computing and Environmental Sciences, Australian Centre for Sustainable Catchments, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba ∥Sunnybank Obesity Centre and SEQS, McCullough Centre, Sunnybank ¶Department of Surgery, Mayne Medical School, University of Queensland, Herston #Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia ‡Institute of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia §Department of Statistics, Biostatistics & Informatics, Dhaka University, Dhaka, Bangladesh **Faculty of Health and Social Science, Bolton University, Bolton, Lancashire, UK
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015 Jun;25(3):185-203.
PMID: 25799261 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000142

Abstract

The utility of early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in the treatment of gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is still contentious.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

MeSH terms
Similar publications