Affiliations 

  • 1 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
MyJurnal

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between heterophoria and refractive error. Thirty-six subjects (11 myopes, 25 emmetropes) participated in this study. Heterophoria was measured with the Free-Space Phoria Card at five different viewing distances (25cm, 33cm, 50cm, 100cm and 300cm). Regardless of the types of heterophoria, the amount of heterophoria reduced towards orthophoric position with increasing viewing distance. Emmetropes and myopes did not show any significant difference in the degree of heterophoria at different viewing distances (F = 0.30, p>0.05) or in the type of heterophoria (c2 = 2, p>0.05).Thirty-six optometry students, aged from 19 to 24 years, participated in this study. All subjects had complete optometric examination within the last two years and did not show any clinical signs of accommodative, fusion, stereopsis or strabismic problems. Written consents were obtained prior to examination. Eleven (8 females, 3 males) of them were myopes (spherical range: -0.25DS to – 10.00DS; cylindrical range: -0.25DC to –0.75DC). Twenty-five (14 females, 11 males) of them were emmetropes (Refraction range: plano - +1.00DS). The majority (10 out of 11) of our myopic subjects. In general, exophores (69%) were most common in this study. Regardless of the type of heterophoria, the amount of heterophoria decreased towards orthophoric position with increasing viewing distances. Our finding are also consistent with the report of fixation disparity at different viewing distance (24).viewing distance. We too report an exo-shift of the heterophoria with decreasing viewing distance 97% of our subjects. One subject however showed an eso-shift for closer distance.